-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Correct naming of com_github_lyft_protoc_gen_star go_repository #31169
Conversation
Hi @alexbozhenko, welcome and thank you for your contribution. We will try to review your Pull Request as quickly as possible. In the meantime, please take a look at the contribution guidelines if you have not done so already. |
CC @envoyproxy/dependency-shepherds: Your approval is needed for changes made to |
Signed-off-by: Alex Bozhenko <[email protected]>
e765253
to
22dd6c7
Compare
Seems fine, but maybe I'm a bit dense - how does the Bazel internal name matter? |
@htuch: we have a setup where we import this repo and use |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK, seems harmless and technically right.
/retest |
@alexbozhenko unfortunately we have just updated our ci framework so |
Commit Message:Correct naming of com_github_lyft_protoc_gen_star go_repository
Additional Description:
Similar to bufbuild/protoc-gen-validate#900
correct naming should include the major version.
https://go.dev/ref/mod#module-path
So go_repository stanza also should include the major version, to distinguish between the different major versions of the module, that can coexist.
After the change, the naming is consistent:
Risk Level: None
Testing: CI passes...?
Docs Changes:
Release Notes:
Platform Specific Features:
[Optional Runtime guard:]
[Optional Fixes #Issue]
[Optional Fixes commit #PR or SHA]
[Optional Deprecated:]
[Optional API Considerations:]
Signed-off-by: Alex Bozhenko [email protected]