Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
wasm: Force stop iteration after local response is sent #13930
wasm: Force stop iteration after local response is sent #13930
Changes from 6 commits
bd4423c
4ed88b7
2de4fba
7f8eb32
300440f
c4f64e1
9977516
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Given that the filter code is in a different repo, does it make sense to have assertions like this one about the return values of decodeHeaders in the main repo? It doesn't seem right to me. This PR can go in anyway, but we should rethink how this works going forward.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The test filter is in this repo, this is the test case for which the behavior changed:
envoy/test/extensions/filters/http/wasm/test_data/test_cpp.cc
Lines 750 to 754 in 1d6d68b
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So the coding error was in a wasm filter implementation, not in the wasm framework itself?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, this protects against coding errors in user-supplied Wasm filters (i.e.
FilterHeadersStatus::Continue
returned aftersendLocalResponse()
above).