reverse bridge: use local reply instead of ContinueAndEndStream #13414
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…yproxy#13205) Instead of returning ContinueAndEndStream we can respond with a local reply. This removes the only use case of ContinueAndEndStream in non-test code. Signed-off-by: Snow Pettersen <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Instead of returning ContinueAndEndStream we can respond with a local
reply. This removes the only use case of ContinueAndEndStream in
non-test code.
Take two after fb7bdbe has landed with the fix + regression test for this change.
Signed-off-by: Snow Pettersen [email protected]
Risk Level: Medium
Testing: Existing integration test, updated UTs
Docs Changes: n/a
Release Notes: Release note added