Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

config: explicit NACK in gRPC Subscription implementation. #1139

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 20, 2017

Conversation

htuch
Copy link
Member

@htuch htuch commented Jun 19, 2017

Previously, we only ACKed by reflecting the new version when a config is accepted. In this patch, we
send a NACK message (reflecting the existing version) when a config is not accepted.

Previously, we only ACKed by reflecting the new version when a config is accepted. In this patch, we
send a NACK message (reflecting the existing version) when a config is not accepted.
Copy link
Contributor

@dnoe dnoe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@htuch htuch merged commit 1a17d74 into envoyproxy:master Jun 20, 2017
@htuch htuch deleted the grpc-nack branch June 20, 2017 12:15
jpsim pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 28, 2022
Description: Adds the general-purpose capability for java objects to be associated with and manage native resources tied to the lifecycle of said object. Also introduces filter callbacks as the first use case for this system.
Risk Level: Moderate
Testing: Pending (#1139)

Signed-off-by: Mike Schore <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: JP Simard <[email protected]>
jpsim pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2022
Description: Adds the general-purpose capability for java objects to be associated with and manage native resources tied to the lifecycle of said object. Also introduces filter callbacks as the first use case for this system.
Risk Level: Moderate
Testing: Pending (#1139)

Signed-off-by: Mike Schore <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: JP Simard <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants