Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

perf: perf testing framework / regression testing #961

Closed
mattklein123 opened this issue May 14, 2017 · 5 comments
Closed

perf: perf testing framework / regression testing #961

mattklein123 opened this issue May 14, 2017 · 5 comments
Labels

Comments

@mattklein123
Copy link
Member

@htuch I made this issue for the intern to cover OSS stuff. We can keep track of items here as they come up.

@mattklein123 mattklein123 modified the milestone: 1.4.0 May 19, 2017
@htuch
Copy link
Member

htuch commented May 31, 2017

We should also investigate #1033 as part of this work.

@mattklein123 mattklein123 modified the milestones: 1.4.0, 1.5.0 Jul 21, 2017
@mattklein123 mattklein123 added the help wanted Needs help! label Oct 6, 2017
@mattklein123 mattklein123 removed this from the 1.5.0 milestone Oct 6, 2017
rshriram pushed a commit to rshriram/envoy that referenced this issue Oct 30, 2018
Automatic merge from submit-queue.

Revert MixerClient stats

This reverts commit 8d2fc52.

**What this PR does / why we need it**: Due to segmentation fault issue #[2906](istio/istio#2906), temporarily revert Mixer stats. There are three commits to be reverted. 

**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #

**Special notes for your reviewer**:

**Release note**:

```release-note
```
@htuch
Copy link
Member

htuch commented May 16, 2019

We now have Nighthawk (https://github.com/envoyproxy/nighthawk) with the requisite load generation tools. I think it would be great if someone wants to pick up the creation of an orchestration and CI regression / visualization framework around this. It would be very useful to have an understanding how basic QPS vs. latency tracks over time.

CC @mattklein123 @oschaaf

@mattklein123
Copy link
Member Author

Agreed this sounds amazing. Let's discuss this on the next community call?

@htuch
Copy link
Member

htuch commented May 20, 2019

@mattklein123 added to agenda, good idea.

@mattklein123
Copy link
Member Author

This is in progress and covered by Salvo and various design documents. Closing this and we can track elsewhere.

jpsim pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 28, 2022
Signed-off-by: Alan Chiu <[email protected]>

For an explanation of how to fill out the fields, please see the relevant section
in [PULL_REQUESTS.md](https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy/blob/master/PULL_REQUESTS.md)

Description: android: docs update NDK to be 21 rather than 19
Risk Level: low
Testing: n/a
Docs Changes: buidling docs for android
Release Notes: n/a
[Optional Fixes #Issue]
[Optional Deprecated:]

Signed-off-by: JP Simard <[email protected]>
jpsim pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 29, 2022
Signed-off-by: Alan Chiu <[email protected]>

For an explanation of how to fill out the fields, please see the relevant section
in [PULL_REQUESTS.md](https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy/blob/master/PULL_REQUESTS.md)

Description: android: docs update NDK to be 21 rather than 19
Risk Level: low
Testing: n/a
Docs Changes: buidling docs for android
Release Notes: n/a
[Optional Fixes #Issue]
[Optional Deprecated:]

Signed-off-by: JP Simard <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants