Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TERNA PR4 & PR5 (Update machinev1) #96

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

smazzucco
Copy link

Proposal of implementing the Ad-hoc “Accidental Event (No Malice)” Category that includes the “Misconfiguration” example.

Proposal of implementing the Ad-hoc “Accidental Event (No Malice)” Category that includes the “Misconfiguration” example.
@@ -238,7 +243,7 @@
"value": "undetermined"
}
],
"predicate": "other"
"predicate": "accidental event"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is the "other" taxonomy renamed? that's a major change with big impact

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's not renamed. I copied the part to introduce "Accidental Event" Category including "Misconfiguration" example (takem from "Availability")

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You created accidental event by copying it, yes. But you also modified the other-taxonomy as these two lines clearly show.

@amicaross
Copy link
Contributor

concept needs more info to be evaluated: at the moment we have misconfiguration and all the other categories for this. RSIT is not interested in accidental events but security events which stems from that accident.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants