Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GitHub Workflows security hardening #2899

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 1, 2022
Merged

Conversation

sashashura
Copy link
Contributor

This PR adds explicit permissions section to workflows. This is a security best practice because by default workflows run with extended set of permissions (except from on: pull_request from external forks). By specifying any permission explicitly all others are set to none. By using the principle of least privilege the damage a compromised workflow can do (because of an injection or compromised third party tool or action) is restricted.
It is recommended to have most strict permissions on the top level and grant write permissions on job level case by case.

@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Sep 20, 2022

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 7d04d43

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@codesandbox-ci
Copy link

codesandbox-ci bot commented Sep 20, 2022

This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox.

To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA.

Latest deployment of this branch, based on commit 7d04d43:

Sandbox Source
Emotion Configuration

@@ -8,8 +8,13 @@ on:

concurrency: ${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.ref }}

permissions: {}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

q: is this required if explicit permissions are specified for one of the jobs?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is optional. I added it prevent the case when a new job is added and it inherits the default permissions, but as long as there is only one job it will use it's own permissions.

@@ -6,6 +6,9 @@ on:
- main
pull_request:

permissions:
contents: read # to fetch code (actions/checkout)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

shouldn't this only be granted for actions/checkout?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Permissions are per job unfortunately, not per step. All jobs do checkout, so it makes sense to define it a global.

Comment on lines 15 to 16
contents: write # to create release
pull-requests: write # to create pull request
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

are you a Changeset user? did you have a chance to confirm that those are the only ones needed for this action?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@sashashura sashashura Sep 20, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is optional. I added it prevent the case when a new job is added and it inherits the default permissions, but as long as there is only one job it will use it's own permissions. Wrong comment

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I didn't have a chance to try it. If it fails it can be expanded.

@sashashura
Copy link
Contributor Author

Is it ready to be merged?

@Andarist Andarist merged commit acb72a4 into emotion-js:main Dec 1, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants