Fixed typedef inside function. Fixes #272

[yulvil]

For #272

This change is 

[yulvil]

@elliotchance I am still trying to come up with tests for this change, but all the tests require #322 to be fixed first.

It is up to you to decide if you want to wait for #322.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #347 into master will increase coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 66.66%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #347      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   81.62%   81.62%   +<.01%     
==========================================
  Files         142      142              
  Lines        6013     6014       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits         4908     4909       +1     
  Misses        885      885              
  Partials      220      220

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
transpiler/variables.go	85% <66.66%> (+0.07%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1618013...1208fba. Read the comment docs.

[Konstantin8105]

Could you check the result of that example:

int main(){
    typedef int INT;
    INT i = 42;
    return 0;
}

Is look like that :

type INT int // <---- Outside of function
func main(){
    var i INT = 42;
}

[yulvil]

@Konstantin8105 Hi. This is an easy fix that will fix most of the typedef cases.

I opened another issue #346 to fix the rare cases (?) where a typedef is defined multiple times (with different target types) within the same compilation unit.

[Konstantin8105]

@yulvil Hello, yes you are right. Now,c2go haven't any support of typedef types. It is more then nothing. And about - how to inject into function, we will in next PR.

[elliotchance]

I don't see any test cases for this so I'm not sure what has changed?

---

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r1.
Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, all discussions resolved.

---

Comments from Reviewable

[yulvil]

@elliotchance I need to fix #322 before I can write a test case that is working.

[elliotchance]

Do you want it merged or do you want me to wait for #322?

---

Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, all discussions resolved, all commit checks successful.

---

Comments from Reviewable

[yulvil]

@elliotchance Please merge. I think it is safe. I will provide tests later.