-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 224
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix perf when streams don't change often #17767
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
Fix performance of streams that don't change often. |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -53,8 +53,8 @@ def test_has_entity_changed(self) -> None: | |
# return True, whether it's a known entity or not. | ||
self.assertTrue(cache.has_entity_changed("[email protected]", 0)) | ||
self.assertTrue(cache.has_entity_changed("[email protected]", 0)) | ||
self.assertTrue(cache.has_entity_changed("[email protected]", 3)) | ||
self.assertTrue(cache.has_entity_changed("[email protected]", 3)) | ||
self.assertTrue(cache.has_entity_changed("[email protected]", 2)) | ||
self.assertTrue(cache.has_entity_changed("[email protected]", 2)) | ||
Comment on lines
+56
to
+57
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Should we add checks for |
||
|
||
def test_entity_has_changed_pops_off_start(self) -> None: | ||
""" | ||
|
@@ -76,9 +76,11 @@ def test_entity_has_changed_pops_off_start(self) -> None: | |
self.assertTrue("[email protected]" not in cache._entity_to_key) | ||
|
||
self.assertEqual( | ||
cache.get_all_entities_changed(3).entities, ["[email protected]"] | ||
cache.get_all_entities_changed(2).entities, | ||
["[email protected]", "[email protected]"], | ||
) | ||
self.assertFalse(cache.get_all_entities_changed(2).hit) | ||
self.assertFalse(cache.get_all_entities_changed(1).hit) | ||
self.assertTrue(cache.get_all_entities_changed(2).hit) | ||
|
||
# If we update an existing entity, it keeps the two existing entities | ||
cache.entity_has_changed("[email protected]", 5) | ||
|
@@ -89,7 +91,8 @@ def test_entity_has_changed_pops_off_start(self) -> None: | |
cache.get_all_entities_changed(3).entities, | ||
["[email protected]", "[email protected]"], | ||
) | ||
self.assertFalse(cache.get_all_entities_changed(2).hit) | ||
self.assertFalse(cache.get_all_entities_changed(1).hit) | ||
self.assertTrue(cache.get_all_entities_changed(2).hit) | ||
|
||
def test_get_all_entities_changed(self) -> None: | ||
""" | ||
|
@@ -114,7 +117,8 @@ def test_get_all_entities_changed(self) -> None: | |
self.assertEqual( | ||
cache.get_all_entities_changed(3).entities, ["[email protected]"] | ||
) | ||
self.assertFalse(cache.get_all_entities_changed(1).hit) | ||
self.assertFalse(cache.get_all_entities_changed(0).hit) | ||
self.assertTrue(cache.get_all_entities_changed(1).hit) | ||
|
||
# ... later, things gest more updates | ||
cache.entity_has_changed("[email protected]", 5) | ||
|
@@ -149,7 +153,7 @@ def test_has_any_entity_changed(self) -> None: | |
# With no entities, it returns True for the past, present, and False for | ||
# the future. | ||
self.assertTrue(cache.has_any_entity_changed(0)) | ||
self.assertTrue(cache.has_any_entity_changed(1)) | ||
self.assertFalse(cache.has_any_entity_changed(1)) | ||
self.assertFalse(cache.has_any_entity_changed(2)) | ||
|
||
# We add an entity | ||
|
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We had a long conversation about this @ matrix-org/synapse#14435 (comment), during which I said:
Your response was:
It looks like I interpreted "before" incorrectly in that case, since at the stream position we do have the "proper" information needed to calculate whether there were changes or not.
The comment for
_earliest_known_stream_pos
even makes this clear:synapse/synapse/util/caches/stream_change_cache.py
Lines 91 to 93 in ef9ef99
tl;dr Before #14435 we were inconsistently checking if it was strictly before or before-or-equal, we made them consistent in that PR, but to the wrong one.