Bump the RustSDK to v1.0.67

[stefanceriu]

No description provided.

[github-actions]

	Warnings
⚠️	Please provide a description for this PR.
⚠️	Some of the commits are missing ticket numbers. Please consider squashing all commits that don't have a tracking number.
⚠️	You seem to have made changes to views. Please consider adding screenshots.

Generated by 🚫 Danger Swift against b18d66f

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 20.83333% with 57 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 78.43%. Comparing base (b122b02) to head (b18d66f).
Report is 2 commits behind head on develop.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...om/RoomSummary/RoomMessageEventStringBuilder.swift	0.00%	17 Missing ⚠️
...ne/TimelineController/RoomTimelineController.swift	0.00%	14 Missing ⚠️
...X/Sources/Screens/Timeline/TimelineViewModel.swift	0.00%	8 Missing ⚠️
...Sources/FlowCoordinators/RoomFlowCoordinator.swift	16.66%	5 Missing ⚠️
...meline/TimelineItems/RoomTimelineItemFactory.swift	20.00%	4 Missing ⚠️
...mentX/Sources/Other/Extensions/ClientBuilder.swift	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
...ces/Screens/RoomScreen/RoomScreenCoordinator.swift	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
...ices/Room/RoomSummary/RoomEventStringBuilder.swift	50.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
...olveVerifiedUserSendFailureScreenCoordinator.swift	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
...esolveVerifiedUserSendFailureScreenViewModel.swift	75.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #3512      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    78.45%   78.43%   -0.02%     
===========================================
  Files          751      752       +1     
  Lines        62584    62735     +151     
===========================================
+ Hits         49099    49205     +106     
- Misses       13485    13530      +45     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	69.52% <20.83%> (-0.04%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[pixlwave]

Fun update 🫠

[pixlwave]

Honestly, I think I prefer call these mock so it is super clear what it is.

Suggested change

	static var randomSendHandle: SendHandleProxy {
	static var mock: SendHandleProxy {

[pixlwave]

Oh nice, totally missed these when adopting captions.

[pixlwave]

This shouldn't be committed.

[pixlwave]

For consistency I think we should call this itemID tbf.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud