-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 739
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixes Changing Account Settings > Notifications > Advanced Notifications on android causes discrepancies with web #3681
Merged
bmarty
merged 8 commits into
develop
from
feature/dla/fix_account_notifications_discrepancies
Jul 27, 2021
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
dff8503
fix discrepancies with web
langleyd a29ccda
move mutable push rule logic to static declarations as on web
langleyd 55902b5
checks
langleyd 89ece22
Merge branch 'develop' of github.com:vector-im/element-android into f…
langleyd da993b5
lint
langleyd 608a1d3
clarify sdk update and cleanup typos
langleyd 5d092ce
simplify getHighlight logic
langleyd 9c139b3
Merge branch 'develop' of github.com:vector-im/element-android into f…
langleyd File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -130,10 +130,11 @@ class PushRulePreference : VectorPreference { | |
} | ||
} else { | ||
if (NOTIFICATION_OFF_INDEX == index) { | ||
if (safeKind == RuleSetKey.UNDERRIDE || safeRule.ruleId == RuleIds.RULE_ID_SUPPRESS_BOTS_NOTIFICATIONS) { | ||
if (safeKind == RuleSetKey.UNDERRIDE && safeRule.ruleId != RuleIds.RULE_ID_CALL) { | ||
safeRule.setNotify(false) | ||
} else { | ||
safeRule.copy(enabled = false) | ||
.removeNotificationSound() | ||
} | ||
} else { | ||
val newRule = safeRule.copy(enabled = true) | ||
|
@@ -142,7 +143,7 @@ class PushRulePreference : VectorPreference { | |
&& safeRule.ruleId != RuleIds.RULE_ID_INVITE_ME | ||
&& NOTIFICATION_NOISY_INDEX == index) | ||
|
||
if (NOTIFICATION_NOISY_INDEX == index) { | ||
if (NOTIFICATION_NOISY_INDEX == index && RuleIds.RULE_ID_ROOM_NOTIF != safeRule.ruleId) { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Same remark, should be nice to have some comment to explain why this code is necessary. |
||
newRule.setNotificationSound( | ||
if (safeRule.ruleId == RuleIds.RULE_ID_CALL) { | ||
Action.ACTION_OBJECT_VALUE_VALUE_RING | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I understand that it was not possible for
safeRule.ruleId == RuleIds.RULE_ID_SUPPRESS_BOTS_NOTIFICATIONS
to be true here. But why checkingRULE_ID_CALL
now?To be honest, this code is really hard to follow, it misses some comment... :/