Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CI] Detect architecture when determining node download url #91497

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 16, 2021

Conversation

jbudz
Copy link
Member

@jbudz jbudz commented Feb 16, 2021

Currently CI is setup to always download the x64 Node.js architecture.
When runing builds on ARM machines we'll want to make sure the
architecture matches the machine.

Currently CI is setup to always download the x64 Node.js architecture.
When runing builds on ARM machines we'll want to make sure the
architecture matches the machine.
@jbudz jbudz added Team:Operations Team label for Operations Team v8.0.0 release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes v7.12.0 labels Feb 16, 2021
@jbudz jbudz requested a review from a team as a code owner February 16, 2021 15:13
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/kibana-operations (Team:Operations)

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

💚 Build Succeeded

Metrics [docs]

✅ unchanged

To update your PR or re-run it, just comment with:
@elasticmachine merge upstream

@jbudz jbudz merged commit db6cd86 into elastic:master Feb 16, 2021
@jbudz jbudz deleted the ci/detect-arm branch February 16, 2021 19:21
jbudz added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2021
Currently CI is setup to always download the x64 Node.js architecture.
When runing builds on ARM machines we'll want to make sure the
architecture matches the machine.
@jbudz
Copy link
Member Author

jbudz commented Feb 16, 2021

7.x: 1bfdc14

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backported release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes Team:Operations Team label for Operations Team v7.12.0 v8.0.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants