Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Alerting] retry internal OCC calls within alertsClient #77838
[Alerting] retry internal OCC calls within alertsClient #77838
Changes from all commits
d26fa1f
7af6a9d
d6194e1
98e351d
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seeing as AlertsClient is already a huge file, is there a way we can add the retry into this without adding an extra method for each operation? 🤔
Perhaps by using some kind of decorator that wraps these methods or something along those lines?
This will also become quite a bit more complicated when we introduce optional
version
to these methods, if we can find a way to reduce this into a single extension, it will help with maintenance down the line.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we support decorators? I'm not sure inlining these is going to save all that space, is it? My thinking was that once we add versions to these methods, that basically just means to set retries to 0, so will likely be a straight-forward change to each of the sites.
The reason I separated these out was to try to keep the actual methods a little cleaner - wrapping like this obviously doesn't scale real well, beyond the first time to you do it (now!). I can go either way on inlining, but I think the current shape is a little more readable than inlined.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
After conversation with Gidi, we decided to think about some alternatives to this approach, but couldn't come up with anything that would require even more changes to the alerts client.