Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[APM] Fix missing ML data, and NaN issue #34333
[APM] Fix missing ML data, and NaN issue #34333
Changes from 1 commit
bc98f55
6e709e8
97e7729
2fd0960
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
When is this an array? And can it be an array of mixed (some apm and some non-apm)? Just wondering if that would end up breaking the UI with 6.x apm data leaking in…
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's an array when we want to query multiple indices, like here:
kibana/x-pack/plugins/apm/server/lib/services/get_service.ts
Lines 42 to 45 in d3dd95d
We don't do that atm, and I don't think we will. That being said, I added a test for this exact scenario, and if any of the indices are not apm indices we will not add the filter. In that case 6.x data will leak in, but I think we'll have to cross that bridge when we get there. I don't know how else to do this, so unless you have another solution that takes that into account, I think we can leave it at that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, the only thing I can think is to throw an error here if the indices are mixed, to alert us on the first time we try to do that so we remember this caveat. But that may be overkill if we expect this problem to sort of disappear as we get further and further past the 7.0 release...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Throwing an exception for mixed arrays would add additional logic - I'd prefer to not do that atm.