Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ML] Fixing job cloning when it has an unknown created_by value #29175

Conversation

jgowdyelastic
Copy link
Member

@jgowdyelastic jgowdyelastic commented Jan 23, 2019

If a job has an unknown created_by value, the cloning functionality on the Jobs Management page doesn't work.
This fix forces the Advanced job page to be used in this situation.

@jgowdyelastic jgowdyelastic added bug Fixes for quality problems that affect the customer experience v7.0.0 :ml Feature:Anomaly Detection ML anomaly detection v6.7.0 labels Jan 23, 2019
@jgowdyelastic jgowdyelastic self-assigned this Jan 23, 2019
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/ml-ui

Copy link
Contributor

@walterra walterra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@peteharverson peteharverson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

💔 Build Failed

@jgowdyelastic
Copy link
Member Author

retest

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

💔 Build Failed

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

💚 Build Succeeded

Copy link
Contributor

@alvarezmelissa87 alvarezmelissa87 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Fixes for quality problems that affect the customer experience Feature:Anomaly Detection ML anomaly detection :ml v6.7.0 v7.0.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants