Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[renovate] Match all branches instead of backporting for FTR group #205285

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 30, 2024

Conversation

jbudz
Copy link
Member

@jbudz jbudz commented Dec 30, 2024

FTR dependencies needs to be kept up to date across all branches, but using the backport automation ends up requiring manual intervention due to merge conflicts.

This configures renovate to open separate pull requests per branch for the ftr group. If this works as expected I'll do another pass and see if there's other groups that this makes sense for.

FTR needs to be kept up to date across all branches, but using the
backport automation ends up requiring manual intervention due to merge
conflicts.

This configures renovate to open separate pull requests per branch.  If
this works as expected I'll do another pass and see if there's other
groups that this makes sense for.
@jbudz jbudz added Team:Operations Team label for Operations Team release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes backport:skip This commit does not require backporting labels Dec 30, 2024
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/kibana-operations (Team:Operations)

@jbudz jbudz requested a review from a team December 30, 2024 18:22
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

💚 Build Succeeded

@jbudz jbudz merged commit 2735ac1 into elastic:main Dec 30, 2024
16 checks passed
stratoula pushed a commit to stratoula/kibana that referenced this pull request Jan 2, 2025
…lastic#205285)

FTR dependencies needs to be kept up to date across all branches, but
using the backport automation ends up requiring manual intervention due
to merge conflicts.

This configures renovate to open separate pull requests per branch for
the `ftr` group. If this works as expected I'll do another pass and see
if there's other groups that this makes sense for.
benakansara pushed a commit to benakansara/kibana that referenced this pull request Jan 2, 2025
…lastic#205285)

FTR dependencies needs to be kept up to date across all branches, but
using the backport automation ends up requiring manual intervention due
to merge conflicts.

This configures renovate to open separate pull requests per branch for
the `ftr` group. If this works as expected I'll do another pass and see
if there's other groups that this makes sense for.
cqliu1 pushed a commit to cqliu1/kibana that referenced this pull request Jan 2, 2025
…lastic#205285)

FTR dependencies needs to be kept up to date across all branches, but
using the backport automation ends up requiring manual intervention due
to merge conflicts.

This configures renovate to open separate pull requests per branch for
the `ftr` group. If this works as expected I'll do another pass and see
if there's other groups that this makes sense for.
jbudz added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 3, 2025
Follow up to #205285

This uses renovate instead of backport tooling on a few more of
operation's groups. These were selected because they have not required
any code changes to date.
kowalczyk-krzysztof pushed a commit to kowalczyk-krzysztof/kibana that referenced this pull request Jan 7, 2025
Follow up to elastic#205285

This uses renovate instead of backport tooling on a few more of
operation's groups. These were selected because they have not required
any code changes to date.
CAWilson94 pushed a commit to CAWilson94/kibana that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2025
…lastic#205285)

FTR dependencies needs to be kept up to date across all branches, but
using the backport automation ends up requiring manual intervention due
to merge conflicts.

This configures renovate to open separate pull requests per branch for
the `ftr` group. If this works as expected I'll do another pass and see
if there's other groups that this makes sense for.
CAWilson94 pushed a commit to CAWilson94/kibana that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2025
Follow up to elastic#205285

This uses renovate instead of backport tooling on a few more of
operation's groups. These were selected because they have not required
any code changes to date.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport:skip This commit does not require backporting release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes Team:Operations Team label for Operations Team v9.0.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants