-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Fleet] [Cloud Security] Add Testing Library ESLint for handling waitFor #198735
Merged
Merged
Changes from 9 commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ac0554f
add testing library eslint
opauloh dff28c3
fix setup technology error
opauloh 23b8d68
review setup technology test cases
opauloh 5193608
handle unhandled waitFor catched by eslint
opauloh 53e8e57
fix eslint rule
opauloh d4d3c67
Merge branch 'main' into reliability/add-eslint-waitFor
opauloh 35fbf7b
Merge branch 'main' into reliability/add-eslint-waitFor
opauloh f450ea9
setting cloud security agentless tests to latest integration version
opauloh 192ccab
upgrading cloud security version for agentless tests
opauloh a96f9af
Updating comment
opauloh b2c2456
adding namespace from package policy test
opauloh 5c59070
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/reliability/add-eslint-waitFor' …
opauloh 536a4ad
adding default namespace test
opauloh File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: I think that usually the package policies have either
default
or a custom namespace, I don't think it's possible to have it undefined in reality. Did you want to test something related to this field?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for clarifying it, I could see some integrations actually have empty package policy namespace, but not
undefined
, also they fallback todefault
when the namespace is empty, I updated the tests to reflect that.it should fallback to the default namespace when namespace is not set in package policy and there's no agent policy
it should display namespace from agent policy when there's no package policy namespace
it should display vars coming from package policy