Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add appex-qa as codeowner for FTR serverless base config files #163914

Conversation

dmlemeshko
Copy link
Member

Summary

This way Appex-QA can keep track on config changes and make sure folks aware that some changes might not work for real MKI-hosted projects.

@dmlemeshko dmlemeshko requested a review from pheyos August 15, 2023 08:08
@dmlemeshko dmlemeshko added release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes backport:skip This commit does not require backporting v8.10.0 labels Aug 15, 2023
@dmlemeshko dmlemeshko marked this pull request as ready for review August 15, 2023 08:10
Copy link
Member

@pheyos pheyos left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@dmlemeshko dmlemeshko enabled auto-merge (squash) August 15, 2023 08:15
@kibana-ci
Copy link
Collaborator

💚 Build Succeeded

Metrics [docs]

✅ unchanged

To update your PR or re-run it, just comment with:
@elasticmachine merge upstream

@dmlemeshko dmlemeshko merged commit 12a10d9 into elastic:main Aug 15, 2023
bryce-b pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 22, 2023
## Summary

This way Appex-QA can keep track on config changes and make sure folks
aware that some changes might not work for real MKI-hosted projects.
@dmlemeshko dmlemeshko deleted the ftr/appex-qa-code-owner-for-base-serverless-configs branch November 21, 2023 12:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport:skip This commit does not require backporting release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes v8.10.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants