Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[6.x] Fix invisible filters caused by missing index pattern (#14131) #14274

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 3, 2017

Conversation

Bargs
Copy link
Contributor

@Bargs Bargs commented Oct 3, 2017

"invisible filters" occur when the mapping chain throws an error. If a single filter throws an error, the entire chain rejects. As a result, not even the valid filters appear in the filter bar because they never get added to the scope. However the filters still exist in app state and still get sent with each search request.

The most common error occurs when the filter's meta.index property points to a non-existing index pattern. Since this property is only used for looking up field formatters and it is not essential for a working filter, we now fall back on raw values instead of failing if the index pattern is not found. See the PR this one replaces for discussion about other solutions we tried and why we chose to go this route.

"invisible filters" occur when the mapping chain throws an error. If a single filter throws an error, the entire chain rejects. As a result, not even the valid filters appear in the filter bar because they never get added to the scope. However the filters still exist in app state and still get sent with each search request.

The most common error occurs when the filter's meta.index property points to a non-existing index pattern. Since this property is only used for looking up field formatters and it is not essential for a working filter, we now fall back on raw values instead of failing if the index pattern is not found. See the PR this one replaces for discussion about other solutions we tried and why we chose to go this route.
@Bargs Bargs added the backport label Oct 3, 2017
@Bargs Bargs merged commit 48f14ef into elastic:6.x Oct 3, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant