-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Security Solution][Detections] Updates Rule Details to show all historical alerts for a given Rule #120053
Merged
Merged
[Security Solution][Detections] Updates Rule Details to show all historical alerts for a given Rule #120053
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ca5975c
Switches RuleDetails to query alerts by ruleId instead of SO id
spong 3191eec
Increases integrity of test outputs
spong d9694ae
Merge branch 'main' of github.com:elastic/kibana into rule-details-ru…
spong f96a6c8
Merge branch 'main' of github.com:elastic/kibana into rule-details-ru…
spong 4ad6ec0
Cleans up duplicate RuleRegistry functions
spong e0285b4
Merge branch 'main' of github.com:elastic/kibana into rule-details-ru…
spong 5599fe2
Merge branch 'main' of github.com:elastic/kibana into rule-details-ru…
spong ef2c3d6
Removes support for rule.id for alerts filter and updates exceptions …
spong e97e910
Merge branch 'main' of github.com:elastic/kibana into rule-details-ru…
spong 24b226b
Merge branch 'main' of github.com:elastic/kibana into rule-details-ru…
spong File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Garrett, do you know if a go/no-go decision has been made regarding going live with rule_registry in 8.0? There's still some ongoing discussions regarding AAD schema which is extremely concerning considering where we are in the release cycle. Wondering what are chances of us being asked to revert this stuff back to
.siem-signals-*
(which means we'd need theruleRegistryEnabled
feature flag in the code):There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Verified RuleRegistry is a go for security in
8.0
, so all good here 🙂