-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Security Solution] Add supported field to ransomware #100135
Merged
kevinlog
merged 11 commits into
elastic:master
from
kevinlog:task/add-supported-field-ransomware
May 19, 2021
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
fce1126
add supported field to ransomware
kevinlog c984947
fix types
kevinlog 9859771
fix test
kevinlog 8973453
add tests
kevinlog 3c740da
fix test
kevinlog 4f588b2
adjust tests
kevinlog fc43e0e
adjust tests
kevinlog 1cc4eab
Merge branch 'master' into task/add-supported-field-ransomware
kibanamachine fd5abcf
add mirgration
kevinlog fa919b2
add migration test
kevinlog d906611
Merge branch 'master' into task/add-supported-field-ransomware
kibanamachine File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is there a reason why you created another function as opposed to just updating the existing policyFactory (policy config with defaults for platinum licenses) and the policyFactoryWithoutPaidFeatures (policy config with defaults for gold and below licenses) windows.ransomware.supported fields?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I also use this function to correctly set the
supported
when the license changes. I want to ensure that I'm only changing the fields that I want to. I broke it out to its own function so that I didn't resent everything to the default.You can see how it's used here: https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/100135/files#diff-6a6ff8e750469752a4993b278b7023af4bef43a49ccee59c3933e3d7c68c78f5R26
Also here in a test: https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/100135/files#diff-861c70c43696ed0ea535a55a47a316c434a14510046d2eb623d6b228d32e4c8eR211
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
gotcha!