Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix NumberFieldMapper Referencing its Own Builder (#77131) #77168

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 2, 2021

Conversation

original-brownbear
Copy link
Member

Investigating the heap use of mapper instances I found this.
It seems quite a bit of overhead for these instances goes into
the builder field. In other mappers we retain the script service
and the script outright, so I did the same thing here to make these
instances a little smaller.

backport of #77131

Investigating the heap use of mapper instances I found this.
It seems quite a bit of overhead for these instances goes into
the builder field. In other mappers we retain the script service
and the script outright, so I did the same thing here to make these
instances a little smaller.
@original-brownbear original-brownbear added >non-issue :Search Foundations/Mapping Index mappings, including merging and defining field types backport labels Sep 2, 2021
@elasticmachine elasticmachine added the Team:Search Meta label for search team label Sep 2, 2021
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-search (Team:Search)

@original-brownbear
Copy link
Member Author

Jenkins run
elasticsearch-ci/bwc

@original-brownbear original-brownbear merged commit 841d2ca into elastic:7.x Sep 2, 2021
@original-brownbear original-brownbear deleted the 77131-7.x branch September 2, 2021 11:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport >non-issue :Search Foundations/Mapping Index mappings, including merging and defining field types Team:Search Meta label for search team v7.16.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants