Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DOCS] [7.x] Create a new page for dissect content in scripting docs #73437 #73507

Merged
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
7 changes: 1 addition & 6 deletions docs/reference/scripting/common-script-uses.asciidoc
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -17,15 +17,10 @@ There are two options at your disposal:
* <<grok,Grok>> is a regular expression dialect that supports aliased
expressions that you can reuse. Because Grok sits on top of regular expressions
(regex), any regular expressions are valid in grok as well.
* <<dissect-processor,Dissect>> extracts structured fields out of text, using
* <<dissect,Dissect>> extracts structured fields out of text, using
delimiters to define the matching pattern. Unlike grok, dissect doesn't use regular
expressions.

Regex is incredibly powerful but can be complicated. If you don't need the
power of regular expressions, use dissect patterns, which are simple and
often faster than grok patterns. Paying special attention to the parts of the string
you want to discard will help build successful dissect patterns.

Let's start with a simple example by adding the `@timestamp` and `message`
fields to the `my-index` mapping as indexed fields. To remain flexible, use
`wildcard` as the field type for `message`:
Expand Down
310 changes: 310 additions & 0 deletions docs/reference/scripting/dissect-syntax.asciidoc
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,310 @@
[[dissect]]
=== Dissecting data
Dissect matches a single text field against a defined pattern. A dissect
pattern is defined by the parts of the string you want to discard. Paying
special attention to each part of a string helps to build successful dissect
patterns.

If you don't need the power of regular expressions, use dissect patterns instead
of grok. Dissect uses a much simpler syntax than grok and is typically faster
overall. The syntax for dissect is transparent: tell dissect what you want and
it will return those results to you.

[[dissect-syntax]]
==== Dissect patterns
Dissect patterns are comprised of _variables_ and _separators_. Anything
defined by a percent sign and curly braces `%{}` is considered a variable,
such as `%{clientip}`. You can assign variables to any part of data in a field,
and then return only the parts that you want. Separators are any values between
variables, which could be spaces, dashes, or other delimiters.

For example, let's say you have log data with a `message` field that looks like
this:

[source,js]
----
"message" : "247.37.0.0 - - [30/Apr/2020:14:31:22 -0500] \"GET /images/hm_nbg.jpg HTTP/1.0\" 304 0"
----
// NOTCONSOLE

You assign variables to each part of the data to construct a successful
dissect pattern. Remember, tell dissect _exactly_ what you want you want to
match on.


[NOTE]
====
ASDLKJASLDKF

ASDFLKJA;SLDrF
====

The first part of the data looks like an IP address, so you
can assign a variable like `%{clientip}`. The next two characters are dashes
with a space on either side. You can assign a variable for each dash, or a
single variable to represent the dashes and spaces. Next are a set of brackets
containing a timestamp. The brackets are a separator, so you include those in
the dissect pattern. Thus far, the data and matching dissect pattern look like
this:

[source,js]
----
247.37.0.0 - - [30/Apr/2020:14:31:22 -0500] <1>

%{clientip} %{ident} %{auth} [%{@timestamp}] <2>
----
// NOTCONSOLE
<1> The first chunks of data from the `message` field
<2> Dissect pattern to match on the selected data chunks

Using that same logic, you can create variables for the remaining chunks of
data. Double quotation marks are separators, so include those in your dissect
pattern. The pattern replaces `GET` with a `%{verb}` variable, but keeps `HTTP`
as part of the pattern.

[source,js]
----
\"GET /images/hm_nbg.jpg HTTP/1.0\" 304 0

"%{verb} %{request} HTTP/%{httpversion}" %{response} %{size}
----
// NOTCONSOLE

Combining the two patterns results in a dissect pattern that looks like this:

[source,js]
----
%{clientip} %{ident} %{auth} [%{@timestamp}] \"%{verb} %{request} HTTP/%{httpversion}\" %{status} %{size}
----
// NOTCONSOLE

Now that you have a dissect pattern, how do you test and use it?

[[dissect-patterns-test]]
==== Test dissect patterns with Painless
You can incorporate dissect patterns into Painless scripts to extract
data. To test your script, use either the {painless}/painless-execute-api.html#painless-execute-runtime-field-context[field contexts] of the Painless
execute API or create a runtime field that includes the script. Runtime fields
offer greater flexibility and accept multiple documents, but the Painless execute
API is a great option if you don't have write access on a cluster where you're
testing a script.

For example, test your dissect pattern with the Painless execute API by
including your Painless script and a single document that matches your data.
Start by indexing the `message` field as a `wildcard` data type:

[source,console]
----
PUT my-index
{
"mappings": {
"properties": {
"message": {
"type": "wildcard"
}
}
}
}
----

If you want to retrieve the HTTP response code, add your dissect pattern to a
Painless script that extracts the `response` value. To extract values from a
field, use this function:

[source,painless]
----
`.extract(doc["<field_name>"].value)?.<field_value>`
----

In this example, `message` is the `<field_name>` and `response` is the
`<field_value>`:

[source,console]
----
POST /_scripts/painless/_execute
{
"script": {
"source": """
String response=dissect('%{clientip} %{ident} %{auth} [%{@timestamp}] "%{verb} %{request} HTTP/%{httpversion}" %{response} %{size}').extract(doc["message"].value)?.response;
if (response != null) emit(Integer.parseInt(response)); <1>
"""
},
"context": "long_field", <2>
"context_setup": {
"index": "my-index",
"document": { <3>
"message": """247.37.0.0 - - [30/Apr/2020:14:31:22 -0500] "GET /images/hm_nbg.jpg HTTP/1.0" 304 0"""
}
}
}
----
// TEST[continued]
<1> Runtime fields require the `emit` method to return values.
<2> Because the response code is an integer, use the `long_field` context.
<3> Include a sample document that matches your data.

The result includes the HTTP response code:

[source,console-result]
----
{
"result" : [
304
]
}
----

[[dissect-patterns-runtime]]
==== Use dissect patterns and scripts in runtime fields
If you have a functional dissect pattern, you can add it to a runtime field to
manipulate data. Because runtime fields don't require you to index fields, you
have incredible flexibility to modify your script and how it functions. If you
already <<dissect-patterns-test,tested your dissect pattern>> using the Painless
execute API, you can use that _exact_ Painless script in your runtime field.

To start, add the `message` field as a `wildcard` type like in the previous
section, but also add `@timestamp` as a `date` in case you want to operate on
that field for <<common-script-uses,other use cases>>:

[source,console]
----
PUT /my-index/
{
"mappings": {
"properties": {
"@timestamp": {
"format": "strict_date_optional_time||epoch_second",
"type": "date"
},
"message": {
"type": "wildcard"
}
}
}
}
----

If you want to extract the HTTP response code using your dissect pattern, you
can create a runtime field like `http.response`:

[source,console]
----
PUT my-index/_mappings
{
"runtime": {
"http.response": {
"type": "long",
"script": """
String response=dissect('%{clientip} %{ident} %{auth} [%{@timestamp}] "%{verb} %{request} HTTP/%{httpversion}" %{response} %{size}').extract(doc["message"].value)?.response;
if (response != null) emit(Integer.parseInt(response));
"""
}
}
}
----
// TEST[continued]

After mapping the fields you want to retrieve, index a few records from
your log data into {es}. The following request uses the <<docs-bulk,bulk API>>
to index raw log data into `my-index`:

[source,console]
----
POST /my-index/_bulk?refresh=true
{"index":{}}
{"timestamp":"2020-04-30T14:30:17-05:00","message":"40.135.0.0 - - [30/Apr/2020:14:30:17 -0500] \"GET /images/hm_bg.jpg HTTP/1.0\" 200 24736"}
{"index":{}}
{"timestamp":"2020-04-30T14:30:53-05:00","message":"232.0.0.0 - - [30/Apr/2020:14:30:53 -0500] \"GET /images/hm_bg.jpg HTTP/1.0\" 200 24736"}
{"index":{}}
{"timestamp":"2020-04-30T14:31:12-05:00","message":"26.1.0.0 - - [30/Apr/2020:14:31:12 -0500] \"GET /images/hm_bg.jpg HTTP/1.0\" 200 24736"}
{"index":{}}
{"timestamp":"2020-04-30T14:31:19-05:00","message":"247.37.0.0 - - [30/Apr/2020:14:31:19 -0500] \"GET /french/splash_inet.html HTTP/1.0\" 200 3781"}
{"index":{}}
{"timestamp":"2020-04-30T14:31:22-05:00","message":"247.37.0.0 - - [30/Apr/2020:14:31:22 -0500] \"GET /images/hm_nbg.jpg HTTP/1.0\" 304 0"}
{"index":{}}
{"timestamp":"2020-04-30T14:31:27-05:00","message":"252.0.0.0 - - [30/Apr/2020:14:31:27 -0500] \"GET /images/hm_bg.jpg HTTP/1.0\" 200 24736"}
{"index":{}}
{"timestamp":"2020-04-30T14:31:28-05:00","message":"not a valid apache log"}
----
// TEST[continued]

You can define a simple query to run a search for a specific HTTP response and
return all related fields. Use the `fields` parameter of the search API to
retrieve the `http.response` runtime field.

[source,console]
----
GET my-index/_search
{
"query": {
"match": {
"http.response": "304"
}
},
"fields" : ["http.response"]
}
----
// TEST[continued]

Alternatively, you can define the same runtime field but in the context of a
search request. The runtime definition and the script are exactly the same as
the one defined previously in the index mapping. Just copy that definition into
the search request under the `runtime_mappings` section and include a query
that matches on the runtime field. This query returns the same results as the
search query previously defined for the `http.response` runtime field in your
index mappings, but only in the context of this specific search:

[source,console]
----
GET my-index/_search
{
"runtime_mappings": {
"http.response": {
"type": "long",
"script": """
String response=dissect('%{clientip} %{ident} %{auth} [%{@timestamp}] "%{verb} %{request} HTTP/%{httpversion}" %{response} %{size}').extract(doc["message"].value)?.response;
if (response != null) emit(Integer.parseInt(response));
"""
}
},
"query": {
"match": {
"http.response": "304"
}
},
"fields" : ["http.response"]
}
----
// TEST[continued]
// TEST[s/_search/_search\?filter_path=hits/]

[source,console-result]
----
{
"hits" : {
"total" : {
"value" : 1,
"relation" : "eq"
},
"max_score" : 1.0,
"hits" : [
{
"_index" : "my-index",
"_type" : "_doc",
"_id" : "D47UqXkBByC8cgZrkbOm",
"_score" : 1.0,
"_source" : {
"timestamp" : "2020-04-30T14:31:22-05:00",
"message" : "247.37.0.0 - - [30/Apr/2020:14:31:22 -0500] \"GET /images/hm_nbg.jpg HTTP/1.0\" 304 0"
},
"fields" : {
"http.response" : [
304
]
}
}
]
}
}
----
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"_id" : "D47UqXkBByC8cgZrkbOm"/"_id": $body.hits.hits.0._id/]
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions docs/reference/scripting/using.asciidoc
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -566,4 +566,5 @@ DELETE /_ingest/pipeline/my_test_scores_pipeline

////

include::dissect-syntax.asciidoc[]
include::grok-syntax.asciidoc[]