Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add field type for version strings (#59773) #62692

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 21, 2020

Conversation

cbuescher
Copy link
Member

This PR adds a new 'version' field type that allows indexing string values
representing software versions similar to the ones defined in the Semantic
Versioning definition (semver.org). The field behaves very similar to a
'keyword' field but allows efficient sorting and range queries that take into
accound the special ordering needed for version strings. For example, the main
version parts are sorted numerically (ie 2.0.0 < 11.0.0) whereas this wouldn't
be possible with 'keyword' fields today.

Valid version values are similar to the Semantic Versioning definition, with the
notable exception that in addition to the "main" version consiting of
major.minor.patch, we allow less or more than three numeric identifiers, i.e.
"1.2" or "1.4.6.123.12" are treated as valid too.

Relates to #48878

This PR adds a new 'version' field type that allows indexing string values
representing software versions similar to the ones defined in the Semantic
Versioning definition (semver.org). The field behaves very similar to a
'keyword' field but allows efficient sorting and range queries that take into
accound the special ordering needed for version strings. For example, the main
version parts are sorted numerically (ie 2.0.0 < 11.0.0) whereas this wouldn't
be possible with 'keyword' fields today.

Valid version values are similar to the Semantic Versioning definition, with the
notable exception that in addition to the "main" version consiting of
major.minor.patch, we allow less or more than three numeric identifiers, i.e.
"1.2" or "1.4.6.123.12" are treated as valid too.

Relates to elastic#48878
@cbuescher
Copy link
Member Author

@elasticmachine run elasticsearch-ci/2

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant