-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Describe STALE_STATE_CONFIG in ClusterFormationFH #53878
Merged
DaveCTurner
merged 3 commits into
elastic:master
from
DaveCTurner:2020-03-20-STALE_STATE_CONFIG-explanation
Mar 20, 2020
Merged
Describe STALE_STATE_CONFIG in ClusterFormationFH #53878
DaveCTurner
merged 3 commits into
elastic:master
from
DaveCTurner:2020-03-20-STALE_STATE_CONFIG-explanation
Mar 20, 2020
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
We mark cluster states persisted on master-ineligible nodes as potentially-stale using the voting configuration `{STALE_STATE_CONFIG}` which prevents these nodes from being elected as master if they are restarted as master-eligible. Today we do not handle this special voting configuration differently in the `ClusterFormationFailureHandler`, leading to a mysterious message `an election requires a node with id [STALE_STATE_CONFIG]` if the election does not succeed. This commit adds a special case description for this situation to explain better why this node cannot win an election. Closes elastic#53734
DaveCTurner
added
>enhancement
:Distributed Coordination/Cluster Coordination
Cluster formation and cluster state publication, including cluster membership and fault detection.
v8.0.0
v7.7.0
labels
Mar 20, 2020
Pinging @elastic/es-distributed (:Distributed/Cluster Coordination) |
Wording LGTM, much clearer :) |
original-brownbear
approved these changes
Mar 20, 2020
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM2
@elasticmachine update branch |
DaveCTurner
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 20, 2020
We mark cluster states persisted on master-ineligible nodes as potentially-stale using the voting configuration `{STALE_STATE_CONFIG}` which prevents these nodes from being elected as master if they are restarted as master-eligible. Today we do not handle this special voting configuration differently in the `ClusterFormationFailureHandler`, leading to a mysterious message `an election requires a node with id [STALE_STATE_CONFIG]` if the election does not succeed. This commit adds a special case description for this situation to explain better why this node cannot win an election. Closes #53734
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
:Distributed Coordination/Cluster Coordination
Cluster formation and cluster state publication, including cluster membership and fault detection.
>enhancement
v7.7.0
v8.0.0-alpha1
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We mark cluster states persisted on master-ineligible nodes as
potentially-stale using the voting configuration
{STALE_STATE_CONFIG}
whichprevents these nodes from being elected as master if they are restarted as
master-eligible. Today we do not handle this special voting configuration
differently in the
ClusterFormationFailureHandler
, leading to a mysteriousmessage
an election requires a node with id [STALE_STATE_CONFIG]
if theelection does not succeed.
This commit adds a special case description for this situation to explain
better why this node cannot win an election.
Closes #53734