-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Avoid unneeded refresh with concurrent realtime gets #47895
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
dnhatn
added
>enhancement
:Distributed Indexing/Engine
Anything around managing Lucene and the Translog in an open shard.
v8.0.0
v7.5.0
labels
Oct 11, 2019
Pinging @elastic/es-distributed (:Distributed/Engine) |
ywelsch
approved these changes
Oct 11, 2019
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
server/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/index/engine/InternalEngineTests.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
henningandersen
approved these changes
Oct 11, 2019
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
The test failure is tracked at #43673 |
@ywelsch and @henningandersen thanks for reviewing. |
dnhatn
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 14, 2019
This change should reduce refreshes for a use-case where we perform multiple realtime gets at the same time on an active index. Currently, we only call refresh if the index operation is still on the versionMap. However, at the time we call refresh, that operation might be already or will be included in the latest reader. Hence, we do not need to refresh. Adding another lock here is not an issue as the refresh is already sequential.
dnhatn
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 14, 2019
This change should reduce refreshes for a use-case where we perform multiple realtime gets at the same time on an active index. Currently, we only call refresh if the index operation is still on the versionMap. However, at the time we call refresh, that operation might be already or will be included in the latest reader. Hence, we do not need to refresh. Adding another lock here is not an issue as the refresh is already sequential.
dnhatn
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 14, 2019
This change should reduce refreshes for a use-case where we perform multiple realtime gets at the same time on an active index. Currently, we only call refresh if the index operation is still on the versionMap. However, at the time we call refresh, that operation might be already or will be included in the latest reader. Hence, we do not need to refresh. Adding another lock here is not an issue as the refresh is already sequential.
howardhuanghua
pushed a commit
to TencentCloudES/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 14, 2019
This change should reduce refreshes for a use-case where we perform multiple realtime gets at the same time on an active index. Currently, we only call refresh if the index operation is still on the versionMap. However, at the time we call refresh, that operation might be already or will be included in the latest reader. Hence, we do not need to refresh. Adding another lock here is not an issue as the refresh is already sequential.
dnhatn
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 16, 2019
This change should reduce refreshes for a use-case where we perform multiple realtime gets at the same time on an active index. Currently, we only call refresh if the index operation is still on the versionMap. However, at the time we call refresh, that operation might be already or will be included in the latest reader. Hence, we do not need to refresh. Adding another lock here is not an issue as the refresh is already sequential.
39 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
:Distributed Indexing/Engine
Anything around managing Lucene and the Translog in an open shard.
>enhancement
v6.8.5
v7.4.1
v7.5.0
v8.0.0-alpha1
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This change should reduce refreshes for a use-case where we perform multiple realtime gets at the same time on an active index. Currently, we only call refresh if the index operation is still on the versionMap. However, at the time we call refresh, that operation might be already or will be included in the latest reader. Hence, we do not need to refresh. Adding another lock here is not an issue as the refresh is already sequential.