-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[test] package pre-install java check #32259
Merged
andyb-elastic
merged 1 commit into
elastic:master
from
andyb-elastic:feature-package-java-check
Jul 23, 2018
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: the more I see of this, the more I think that it's worth extending the
onDPKG
type of API to be able to produce values so reading trough the code is more consistent.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks. The version of that I tried looked like this
because the
onFoo
methods still have to return something when they don't run their action. Which doesn't seem much more readable to me. Doing it with anOptional
is a little better. Is there a better one that I'm missing?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The
packagingChoice()
is optional, only if you don't want to keep the Platforms class growing.The
onRpm()
etc type of methods will an instance, sayResultTracker<Result>
and depending of the choice to be made will or will not add a result to it.get()
will just return the result or throw an exception. We could also have aResultTracker<Void>
and adecide()
method instead ofget()
that doesn't return anything. MaybePackagingDecisionMaker
is a better name thanResultTracker
. Since this is for testing, we could have all the result trackers/decision makers register into some static context inPlatforms
perhaps, and add a check after each test to make sure that all of them are "decided" to make sure that one doesn'tPlatforms.onmRpm().onDpkg()
without forgetting to calldecide()
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah right we had something similar in a discussion on another PR, thanks. I'll likely open another one to make that change since we have a few places that would benefit from it now