-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[TEST] share code between streamable/writeable/xcontent base test classes #28785
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…sses Today we have two test base classes that have a lot in common when it comes to testing wire and xcontent serialization: `AbstractSerializingTestCase` and `AbstractXContentStreamableTestCase`. There are subtle differences though between the two, in the way they work, what can be overridden and features that they support (e.g. insertion of random fields). This commit introduces a new base class called `AbstractWireTestCase` which holds all of the serialization test code in common between `Streamable` and `Writeable`. It has two minimal subclasses called `AbstractWireSerializingTestCase` and `AbstractStreamableTestCase` which are specialized for `Writeable` and `Streamable`. This commit also introduces a new test class called `AbstractXContentTestCase` for all of the xContent testing, which holds a testFromXContent method for parsing and rendering to xContent. This one can be delegated to from the existing `AbstractStreamableXContentTestCase` and `AbstractSerializingTestCase` so that we avoid code duplicate as much as possible and all these base classes offer the same functionalities in the same way. Having this last base class decoupled from the serialization testing may also help with the REST high-level client testing, as there are some classes where it's hard to implement equals/hashcode and this makes it possible to override `assertEqualInstances` for custom equality comparisons (also this base class doesn't require implementing equals/hashcode as it doesn't test such methods.
… a static method that takes a bunch of functions are parameters
colings86
approved these changes
Feb 23, 2018
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM - thanks for working to make this all consistent and I love that it all has really good javadocs too
javanna
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 23, 2018
…sses (#28785) Today we have two test base classes that have a lot in common when it comes to testing wire and xcontent serialization: `AbstractSerializingTestCase` and `AbstractXContentStreamableTestCase`. There are subtle differences though between the two, in the way they work, what can be overridden and features that they support (e.g. insertion of random fields). This commit introduces a new base class called `AbstractWireTestCase` which holds all of the serialization test code in common between `Streamable` and `Writeable`. It has two minimal subclasses called `AbstractWireSerializingTestCase` and `AbstractStreamableTestCase` which are specialized for `Writeable` and `Streamable`. This commit also introduces a new test class called `AbstractXContentTestCase` for all of the xContent testing, which holds a testFromXContent method for parsing and rendering to xContent. This one can be delegated to from the existing `AbstractStreamableXContentTestCase` and `AbstractSerializingTestCase` so that we avoid code duplicate as much as possible and all these base classes offer the same functionalities in the same way. Having this last base class decoupled from the serialization testing may also help with the REST high-level client testing, as there are some classes where it's hard to implement equals/hashcode and this makes it possible to override `assertEqualInstances` for custom equality comparisons (also this base class doesn't require implementing equals/hashcode as it doesn't test such methods.
sebasjm
pushed a commit
to sebasjm/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 10, 2018
…sses (elastic#28785) Today we have two test base classes that have a lot in common when it comes to testing wire and xcontent serialization: `AbstractSerializingTestCase` and `AbstractXContentStreamableTestCase`. There are subtle differences though between the two, in the way they work, what can be overridden and features that they support (e.g. insertion of random fields). This commit introduces a new base class called `AbstractWireTestCase` which holds all of the serialization test code in common between `Streamable` and `Writeable`. It has two minimal subclasses called `AbstractWireSerializingTestCase` and `AbstractStreamableTestCase` which are specialized for `Writeable` and `Streamable`. This commit also introduces a new test class called `AbstractXContentTestCase` for all of the xContent testing, which holds a testFromXContent method for parsing and rendering to xContent. This one can be delegated to from the existing `AbstractStreamableXContentTestCase` and `AbstractSerializingTestCase` so that we avoid code duplicate as much as possible and all these base classes offer the same functionalities in the same way. Having this last base class decoupled from the serialization testing may also help with the REST high-level client testing, as there are some classes where it's hard to implement equals/hashcode and this makes it possible to override `assertEqualInstances` for custom equality comparisons (also this base class doesn't require implementing equals/hashcode as it doesn't test such methods.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Today we have two test base classes that have a lot in common when it comes to testing wire and xcontent serialization:
AbstractSerializingTestCase
andAbstractXContentStreamableTestCase
. There are subtle differences though between the two, in the way they work, what can be overridden and features that they support (e.g. insertion of random fields).This commit introduces a new base class called
AbstractWireTestCase
which holds all of the serialization test code in common betweenStreamable
andWriteable
. It has two minimal subclasses calledAbstractWireSerializingTestCase
andAbstractStreamableTestCase
which are specialized forWriteable
andStreamable
.This commit also introduces a new test class called
AbstractXContentTestCase
for all of the xContent testing, which holds a testFromXContent method for parsing and rendering to xContent. This one can be delegated to from the existingAbstractStreamableXContentTestCase
andAbstractSerializingTestCase
so that we avoid code duplicate as much as possible and all these base classes offer the same functionalities in the same way. Having this last base class decoupled from the serialization testing may also help with the REST high-level client testing, as there are some classes where it's hard to implement equals/hashcode and this makes it possible to overrideassertEqualInstances
for custom equality comparisons (also this base class doesn't require implementing equals/hashcode as it doesn't test such methods.