Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CI] ShardChangesRestIT testShardChangesNoOperation failing #118800

Open
elasticsearchmachine opened this issue Dec 16, 2024 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #119128
Open

[CI] ShardChangesRestIT testShardChangesNoOperation failing #118800

elasticsearchmachine opened this issue Dec 16, 2024 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #119128
Assignees
Labels
low-risk An open issue or test failure that is a low risk to future releases :StorageEngine/Logs You know, for Logs Team:StorageEngine >test-failure Triaged test failures from CI

Comments

@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Build Scans:

Reproduction Line:

./gradlew ":x-pack:plugin:ccr:javaRestTest" --tests "org.elasticsearch.xpack.ccr.rest.ShardChangesRestIT.testShardChangesNoOperation" -Dtests.seed=138D22242FDE3214 -Dtests.locale=vun-TZ -Dtests.timezone=Etc/Zulu -Druntime.java=23

Applicable branches:
main

Reproduces locally?:
N/A

Failure History:
See dashboard

Failure Message:

java.net.SocketTimeoutException: 60,000 milliseconds timeout on connection http-outgoing-0 [ACTIVE]

Issue Reasons:

  • [main] 4 failures in test testShardChangesNoOperation (14.8% fail rate in 27 executions)
  • [main] 3 failures in step part-2 (15.8% fail rate in 19 executions)
  • [main] 3 failures in pipeline elasticsearch-pull-request (16.7% fail rate in 18 executions)

Note:
This issue was created using new test triage automation. Please report issues or feedback to es-delivery.

@elasticsearchmachine elasticsearchmachine added :StorageEngine/Logs You know, for Logs >test-failure Triaged test failures from CI labels Dec 16, 2024
@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This has been muted on branch main

Mute Reasons:

  • [main] 4 failures in test testShardChangesNoOperation (14.8% fail rate in 27 executions)
  • [main] 3 failures in step part-2 (15.8% fail rate in 19 executions)
  • [main] 3 failures in pipeline elasticsearch-pull-request (16.7% fail rate in 18 executions)

Build Scans:

@elasticsearchmachine elasticsearchmachine added Team:StorageEngine needs:risk Requires assignment of a risk label (low, medium, blocker) labels Dec 16, 2024
@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Pinging @elastic/es-storage-engine (Team:StorageEngine)

@kkrik-es kkrik-es added :Distributed Indexing/CCR Issues around the Cross Cluster State Replication features Team:Distributed Indexing Meta label for Distributed Indexing team and removed Team:StorageEngine :StorageEngine/Logs You know, for Logs labels Dec 17, 2024
@martijnvg martijnvg added :StorageEngine/Logs You know, for Logs and removed :Distributed Indexing/CCR Issues around the Cross Cluster State Replication features Team:Distributed Indexing Meta label for Distributed Indexing team labels Dec 17, 2024
@salvatore-campagna
Copy link
Contributor

I tried to reproduce it but without managing to have it fail. This test is a bit time-dependent anyway. The shard changes api will wait a bit (depending on timeout) rather than returning an empty response in case at the moment the api call is made there is no change. Waiting is needed to see if a global checkpoint is reached so to return translog operations up to a certain global checkpoint.

@martijnvg martijnvg added low-risk An open issue or test failure that is a low risk to future releases and removed needs:risk Requires assignment of a risk label (low, medium, blocker) labels Dec 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
low-risk An open issue or test failure that is a low risk to future releases :StorageEngine/Logs You know, for Logs Team:StorageEngine >test-failure Triaged test failures from CI
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants