Put _id, _type and _index in INTERNAL_FIELDS rather than KEYWORDS

elastic · Apr 16, 2019 · cb0c7e6 · cb0c7e6
1 parent 51c3e6f
commit cb0c7e6
Showing 1 changed file with 6 additions and 1 deletion.
diff --git a/...test/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/core/ml/job/persistence/ElasticsearchMappingsTests.java b/...test/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/core/ml/job/persistence/ElasticsearchMappingsTests.java
@@ -61,7 +61,10 @@ public class ElasticsearchMappingsTests extends ESTestCase {
             ElasticsearchMappings.NESTED,
             ElasticsearchMappings.PROPERTIES,
             ElasticsearchMappings.TYPE,
-            ElasticsearchMappings.WHITESPACE,
+            ElasticsearchMappings.WHITESPACE
+    );
+
+    private static List<String> INTERNAL_FIELDS = Arrays.asList(
             GetResult._ID,
             GetResult._INDEX,
             GetResult._TYPE
@@ -80,6 +83,7 @@ public void testResultsMapppingReservedFields() throws Exception {
 
         Set<String> expected = collectResultsDocFieldNames();
         expected.removeAll(overridden);
+        expected.addAll(INTERNAL_FIELDS);
 
         compareFields(expected, ReservedFieldNames.RESERVED_RESULT_FIELD_NAMES);
     }
@@ -95,6 +99,7 @@ public void testConfigMapppingReservedFields() throws Exception {
 
         Set<String> expected = collectConfigDocFieldNames();
         expected.removeAll(overridden);
+        expected.addAll(INTERNAL_FIELDS);
 
         compareFields(expected, ReservedFieldNames.RESERVED_CONFIG_FIELD_NAMES);
     }