Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[New Rule] Adding Coverage for AWS S3 Unauthenticated Object Upload by Rare Source #4314

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

terrancedejesus
Copy link
Contributor

@terrancedejesus terrancedejesus commented Dec 17, 2024

Pull Request

Issue link(s):

Summary - What I changed

Adding coverage for AWS S3 Unauthenticated Object Upload by Rare Source.

This rule detects attempts to upload objects to an AWS S3 bucket from an unauthenticated source. Such activity may indicate a misconfigured S3 bucket policy that allows public write access. Adversaries can exploit this misconfiguration to upload malicious content, exfiltrate data, or abuse the bucket as part of their attack infrastructure.

The rule triggers when a rare IP address, not seen in the past 7 days, attempts to upload an object (PutObject) to an S3 bucket without authentication.

How To Test

Screenshot 2024-12-17 at 4 10 24 PM

Checklist

  • Added a label for the type of pr: bug, enhancement, schema, maintenance, Rule: New, Rule: Deprecation, Rule: Tuning, Hunt: New, or Hunt: Tuning so guidelines can be generated
  • Added the meta:rapid-merge label if planning to merge within 24 hours
  • Secret and sensitive material has been managed correctly
  • Automated testing was updated or added to match the most common scenarios
  • Documentation and comments were added for features that require explanation

Contributor checklist

@terrancedejesus terrancedejesus added Integration: AWS AWS related rules Domain: Cloud Rule: New Proposal for new rule labels Dec 17, 2024
@terrancedejesus terrancedejesus self-assigned this Dec 17, 2024
@protectionsmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Rule: New - Guidelines

These guidelines serve as a reminder set of considerations when proposing a new rule.

Documentation and Context

  • Detailed description of the rule.
  • List any new fields required in ECS/data sources.
  • Link related issues or PRs.
  • Include references.

Rule Metadata Checks

  • creation_date matches the date of creation PR initially merged.
  • min_stack_version should support the widest stack versions.
  • name and description should be descriptive and not include typos.
  • query should be inclusive, not overly exclusive, considering performance for diverse environments. Non ecs fields should be added to non-ecs-schema.json if not available in an integration.
  • min_stack_comments and min_stack_version should be included if the rule is only compatible starting from a specific stack version.
  • index pattern should be neither too specific nor too vague, ensuring it accurately matches the relevant data stream (e.g., use logs-endpoint.process-* for process data).
  • integration should align with the index. If the integration is newly introduced, ensure the manifest, schemas, and new_rule.yaml template are updated.
  • setup should include the necessary steps to configure the integration.
  • note should include any additional information (e.g. Triage and analysis investigation guides, timeline templates).
  • tags should be relevant to the threat and align/added to the EXPECTED_RULE_TAGS in the definitions.py file.
  • threat, techniques, and subtechniques should map to ATT&CK always if possible.

New BBR Rules

  • building_block_type should be included if the rule is a building block and the rule should be located in the rules_building_block folder.
  • bypass_bbr_timing should be included if adding custom lookback timing to the rule.

Testing and Validation

  • Provide evidence of testing and detecting the expected threat.
  • Check for existence of coverage to prevent duplication.

@terrancedejesus terrancedejesus marked this pull request as ready for review December 17, 2024 21:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants