Update info about loading dashboards and index templates #4778
Conversation
dedemorton
added
docs
review
needs_backport
auditbeat/docs/faq-ulimit.asciidoc
Outdated
| [[ulimit]] | ||
| === {beatname_uc} fails to watch folders because too many files are open? | ||
|
|
||
| Because of the way file monitoring is implemented on Mac OS, you may see a |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Apple refers to it as "macOS". https://www.apple.com/macos/sierra/
|
@andrewkroh I'm working on another set of changes related to dasbhboard loading. There's quite a bit of overlap with this PR, so I'm going to take the changes in my other branch and cherry-pick them into this branch. I'll mark this PR as "in progress" and continue adding commits to it. I'm going to have to make changes to multiple beats to avoid breaking things, so I'll change the name of this PR, too. |
dedemorton
changed the title
|
|
||
| //REVIEWERS: I'm keeping separate steps for the loading the index template and the dashboards since it seems like the index template loading happens automatically, but the dashboard loading must be specified. It might be confusing to describe this in one step. Plus having separate steps helps users understand that two very different operations are taking place (the loading of the index template into ES and the loading of dashboards into Kibana) | ||
|
|
||
| //TODO: I think this needs to be deleted. Commenting it out for now just in case. Also need to remove conditional flag |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can someone confirm that there is no reason to keep the content commented out here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's perfect the way it's described.
dedemorton
force-pushed
the
update_auditbeat
branch
from
3a1c984 to
8342870
Compare
| is false. | ||
|
|
||
| *`settings.index`*:: A dictionary of settings to place into the `settings.index` dictionary of the | ||
| //REVIEWERS: I don't see the following options in the reference.yml file. Are they still available/valid? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The setup.template.settings shows up only in the metricbeat.yml, not in the reference.yml. I will fix it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good catch @dedemorton. Open a PR: #4791
| {libbeat}/config-file-permissions.html[Config File Ownership and Permissions] | ||
| in the _Beats Platform Reference_). | ||
|
|
||
| //REVIEWERS: It seems really inconvenient to users to expect them to change ownership on all the files in `modules.d`. This is something I had to do, but not 100% sure if there is a better way. Please advise. | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@exekias can have a better input here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I noticed that Tudor also created an issue about this, so I think it is required.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I agree we may need to think about something here, we have strict.perms flag to avoid this (with the cost of losing some security). deb/rpm packages also ave these permissions right by default. Not sure we can help on the tar.gz case
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think using the strict.perms is fine here. I'd explain why it's used and link over to docs for the option.
I made this comment previously, and I still think we should consider it.
Another option would be to make
-strict.perms=falsethe new default. Then modify the scripts that start Beats as services to enable the checks. I liken this to how ES disables bootstrap checks for non-production mode.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@andrewkroh Ok, I've added the note about -strict.perms. I know we're talking about the getting started experience here, but I sort of worry if we start recommending something in the GS that could get people into trouble later on. See how this works. If the developers on the team decide that we want to tell users straight out to run the the beats with -strict.perms=false then I can change it, but the way it's written now users at least understand that there's a choice to be made...and might do more reading before they run the command blindly. (People often run commands without reading the surrounding text.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'd be happy to make -strict.perms=false the default in code when we detect "dev" mode or "getting started". The question is, what's a good sign of production? Is the fact you are running from init script / service file enough? Is deb/rpm production and the tar.gz getting started?
| @@ -289,7 +297,7 @@ docker run {dockerimage} | |||
| [source,shell] | |||
| ---------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
| sudo chown root packetbeat.yml <1> | |||
| sudo ./packetbeat -e -c packetbeat.yml -d "publish" | |||
| sudo ./packetbeat run -e -c packetbeat.yml -d "publish" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
run is the default option, in case it's missing. So, it still works:
sudo ./packetbeat -e -c packetbeat.yml -d "publish"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@monicasarbu Right, but I figured we added run for a reason and might want to show it. Do you think it's better to show the command without including run?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, it's better to show the command without including run to show that the command didn't change.
| You can specify the following options in the `setup.kibana` section of the | ||
| +{beatname_lc}.yml+ config file: | ||
|
|
||
| //REVIEWERS: I've decided to use full paths when referring to options rather than using indentation in examples. WDYT? Makes the examples a tad harder to read but will help immensely with users who don't know where to put stuff in the yaml hierarchy. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good idea. This is easier for the users to copy & paste to their configuration file.
| [float] | ||
| ==== `setup.kibana.host` | ||
|
|
||
| The Kibana host where the dashboards will be loaded. This setting is required. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
By default is 127.0.0.1:5601.
| The Kibana host where the dashboards will be loaded. This setting is required. | ||
| The scheme and port default to `http` and `5601` if you don't set them | ||
| explicitly. If you use a path after the port number, you must specify | ||
| the scheme and port. For example: `http://localhost:5601/path`. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The Kibana configuration is the same as the Elasticsearch output configuration (https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/beats/filebeat/6.x/elasticsearch-output.html#hosts-option).
The host can be an URL or IP:PORT. For example: http://192.15.3.2, 192:15.3.2:5601, http://192.15.3.2:6701/path. If no port is specified, then 5601 is used.
Note: When a node is defined as an IP:PORT, the scheme and path are taken from the protocol and path config options.
| `https`. The default is `http`. However, if you specify a URL for host, the | ||
| value of `protocol` is overridden by whatever scheme you specify in the URL. | ||
|
|
||
| //REVIEWERS: Please check this example. I have not tested it. |
|
|
||
| Enables {beatname_uc} to use SSL settings when connecting to Kibana via HTTPS. | ||
|
|
||
| //REVIEWERS: The reference config file said that the ssl.enabled: true is the default, but that doesn't seem quite right. Do you mean that this setting defaults to true when https is configured? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, if the user configures https then the default ssl values are used.
| setup.kibana.ssl.certificate_authorities: ["/etc/pki/root/ca.pem"] | ||
| setup.kibana.ssl.certificate: "/etc/pki/client/cert.pem" | ||
| setup.kibana.ssl.key: "/etc/pki/client/cert.key | ||
| ---- |
| [float] | ||
| ==== `setup.kibana.ssl.verification_mode` | ||
|
|
||
| //REVEIWERS: Most of this content is copied from the section about configuring outputs. We should probably centralize our descriptions of these options at some point, but copy/paste is faster, so I'm doing that for now |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, ideally would be not to copy it from here: https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/beats/filebeat/6.x/configuration-output-ssl.html. In case something changes, we can change it in a single place.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@monicasarbu If the descriptions truly are identical, then I should just point to the section. I need to:
- bump the topic about setting SSL options up one level in the nav so it's not nested under Configuring the output
- Add an explanation of when the SSL options are valid (output config and Kibana endpoint config).
- Rename the topic ID so it's not specific to configuring the output
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actually, the same ssl configuration is used also by logstash output, kafka output, so it's worth having a single copy and only point to it when needed.
|
Excellent job @dedemorton! |
|
|
||
| Start Filebeat by issuing the appropriate command for your platform. | ||
|
|
||
| NOTE: If you use an init.d script to start Filebeat on deb or rpm, you can't | ||
| specify command line flags (see <<command-line-options>>). To specify flags, | ||
| start Filebeat in the foreground. | ||
|
|
||
| //REVIEWERS: With the new command syntax, should the deb and rpm instructions here say run instead of start? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No, for deb/rpm these commands remain the same. However for different reason we should change the commands to sudo service filebeat start. This ensures that service is started using a clean environment.
|
Sorry didn't mean to close the PR. Meant to cancel a comment that was in progress, but managed to close the PR and submit the comment instead. :-) |
|
@dedemorton I saw this in a GH email but can't find the comment here.
If the packaging was tar.gz and the command uses |
Yah, sorry to waste your time. I meant to delete the comment, not submit it. I was going to make the change and then ask you to review it. I thought about the flag a little more. Since we recommend that users not use the flag, I think it's actually better to show the file ownership change and then modify the note to indicate that the users can run the beat with |
|
@monicasarbu I think this should be close to being ready to merge, no? |
|
Yes, it's ready to be merged. |
Update Auditbeat docs with changes from testing
dedemorton
removed
the
needs_backport
… (elastic#4818) Update Auditbeat docs with changes from testing
I plan to make additional changes to the getting started flow about setting up the dashboards because the current flow is not ideal, but I'll make that in a separate PR.
UPDATE: Changed my mind. Didn't want to have two separate PRs with a mix of changes, so I'll put everything in this PR.