Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add workaround for Heartbeat install issue #3835

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 4, 2017

Conversation

dedemorton
Copy link
Contributor

Documents the workaround for #3765

@geekpete Can you test and confirm that this is accurate?

Here's what the change looks like rendered in the Heartbeat docs:

image
image

@dedemorton dedemorton added docs in progress Pull request is currently in progress. review labels Mar 29, 2017
@geekpete
Copy link
Member

I'll test this on these two OSes shortly and let you know.

@geekpete
Copy link
Member

geekpete commented Mar 31, 2017

LGTM

Using Docker tested Ubuntu latest, Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS, Debian latest and Debian 8.7

docker run -it -l ubuntu-test ubuntu:latest bash
apt update
apt install -y wget sudo
wget -qO - https://artifacts.elastic.co/GPG-KEY-elasticsearch | sudo apt-key add -
sudo apt-get install -y apt-transport-https
echo "deb https://artifacts.elastic.co/packages/5.x/apt stable main" | sudo tee -a /etc/apt/sources.list.d/elastic-5.x.list
echo -e "Package: heartbeat\nPin: origin artifacts.elastic.co\nPin-Priority: 700\n" > /etc/apt/preferences.d/heartbeat
sudo apt update && sudo apt install heartbeat

Other images used:

docker run -it -l ubuntu-test ubuntu:16.04 bash
docker run -it -l debian-test debian:latest bash
docker run -it -l debian-test debian:8.7 bash

Also tested upgrade (just on ubuntu latest) from heartbeat 5.2.1 to 5.3.0 and that worked as expected also.

Copy link
Member

@andrewkroh andrewkroh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Is this still "in progress"?

@dedemorton dedemorton removed the in progress Pull request is currently in progress. label Mar 31, 2017
@dedemorton
Copy link
Contributor Author

@andrewkroh I removed the in progress label. This one is ready to go.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants