x-pack/filebeat/docs/inputs/input-cel: fix docs for redact #36754
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The documentation incorrectly shows the type of redact as a scalar. This is not correct; it should be an array.
efd6
added
bug
docs
Filebeat
botelastic
bot
added
the
needs_team
botelastic
bot
removed
the
needs_team
|
Pinging @elastic/security-external-integrations (Team:Security-External Integrations) |
💚 Build Succeeded
Expand to view the summary
Build stats
❕ Flaky test reportNo test was executed to be analysed. 🤖 GitHub commentsExpand to view the GitHub comments
To re-run your PR in the CI, just comment with:
|
andrewkroh
approved these changes
Oct 5, 2023
mergify bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 5, 2023
The documentation shows the type of redact.fields as a scalar. This is not correct; it should be an array. (cherry picked from commit 2988148)
mergify bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 5, 2023
The documentation shows the type of redact.fields as a scalar. This is not correct; it should be an array. (cherry picked from commit 2988148)
This was referenced Oct 5, 2023
efd6
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 5, 2023
…36755) The documentation shows the type of redact.fields as a scalar. This is not correct; it should be an array. (cherry picked from commit 2988148) Co-authored-by: Dan Kortschak <[email protected]>
efd6
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 5, 2023
…36756) The documentation shows the type of redact.fields as a scalar. This is not correct; it should be an array. (cherry picked from commit 2988148) Co-authored-by: Dan Kortschak <[email protected]>
Scholar-Li
pushed a commit
to Scholar-Li/beats
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2024
…6754) The documentation shows the type of redact.fields as a scalar. This is not correct; it should be an array.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proposed commit message
The documentation shows the type of
redact.fieldsas a scalar. This is not correct; it should be an array.Checklist
CHANGELOG.next.asciidocorCHANGELOG-developer.next.asciidoc.Author's Checklist
How to test this PR locally
Related issues
Use cases
Screenshots
Logs