-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[7.17](backport #36076) Fix empty file edge case #36095
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
It's possible that file scanning happens when the file was created but was not yet written to. In this case the size is 0. We should not spawn any resources (e.g. harvesters) for such files until they actually have some content. We create events only when read something from a file, so having a harvester on an empty file is not useful. Not handling this edge case also causes our tests to be flaky, sometimes an expected size does not match an actual size (0). (cherry picked from commit 0cd5775) # Conflicts: # filebeat/input/filestream/fswatch_test.go
mergify
bot
added
the
conflicts
There is a conflict in the backported pull request
label
Jul 18, 2023
botelastic
bot
added
the
needs_team
Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label
label
Jul 18, 2023
This pull request doesn't have a |
Collaborator
/test filebeat-windows-windows-2019 |
rdner
added a commit
to rdner/beats
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 12, 2023
In elastic#36065 a few fields were renamed in order to clarify their purpose. Unfortunately, this rename was a part of a new feature PR which was not supposed to be backported to 7.17. However, backporting some other changes related to this code has now become challenging and results in build failures (note the fixing commits): - elastic#36095 - elastic#36264 This PR makes the naming consistent with the main branch, so we can easily backport changes.
rdner
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 12, 2023
In #36065 a few fields were renamed in order to clarify their purpose. Unfortunately, this rename was a part of a new feature PR which was not supposed to be backported to 7.17. However, backporting some other changes related to this code has now become challenging and results in build failures (note the fixing commits): - #36095 - #36264 This PR makes the naming consistent with the main branch, so we can easily backport changes.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
backport
conflicts
There is a conflict in the backported pull request
needs_team
Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is an automatic backport of pull request #36076 done by Mergify.
Cherry-pick of 0cd5775 has failed:
To fix up this pull request, you can check it out locally. See documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/github/collaborating-with-pull-requests/reviewing-changes-in-pull-requests/checking-out-pull-requests-locally
Mergify commands and options
More conditions and actions can be found in the documentation.
You can also trigger Mergify actions by commenting on this pull request:
@Mergifyio refresh
will re-evaluate the rules@Mergifyio rebase
will rebase this PR on its base branch@Mergifyio update
will merge the base branch into this PR@Mergifyio backport <destination>
will backport this PR on<destination>
branchAdditionally, on Mergify dashboard you can:
Finally, you can contact us on https://mergify.com