Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[8.0](backport #30025) Document how timestamps set in Kafka messages affect retention #30037

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 26, 2022

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Jan 26, 2022

This is an automatic backport of pull request #30025 done by Mergify.


Mergify commands and options

More conditions and actions can be found in the documentation.

You can also trigger Mergify actions by commenting on this pull request:

  • @Mergifyio refresh will re-evaluate the rules
  • @Mergifyio rebase will rebase this PR on its base branch
  • @Mergifyio update will merge the base branch into this PR
  • @Mergifyio backport <destination> will backport this PR on <destination> branch

Additionally, on Mergify dashboard you can:

  • look at your merge queues
  • generate the Mergify configuration with the config editor.

Finally, you can contact us on https://mergify.com

Some customers find the default behavior when using Kafka outputs
unexpected.There are 2 possible options:

1. Message timestamp to be assigned on event creation (in beats), when the actual event was emitted and then propagated to Kafka
2. Message timestamp to be assigned when Kafka actually receives the
message

Since beats always set the message timestamp for Kafka version 0.10.0.0+ it's
worth to document how to switch between the 2 options in Kafka
configuration using the `log.message.timestamp.type` parameter.

(cherry picked from commit a473d94)
@mergify mergify bot added the backport label Jan 26, 2022
@mergify mergify bot assigned rdner Jan 26, 2022
@botelastic botelastic bot added the needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label label Jan 26, 2022
@botelastic
Copy link

botelastic bot commented Jan 26, 2022

This pull request doesn't have a Team:<team> label.

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

💚 Build Succeeded

the below badges are clickable and redirect to their specific view in the CI or DOCS
Pipeline View Test View Changes Artifacts preview preview

Expand to view the summary

Build stats

  • Start Time: 2022-01-26T19:21:00.724+0000

  • Duration: 20 min 0 sec

  • Commit: bd301e6

❕ Flaky test report

No test was executed to be analysed.

🤖 GitHub comments

To re-run your PR in the CI, just comment with:

  • /test : Re-trigger the build.

  • /package : Generate the packages and run the E2E tests.

  • /beats-tester : Run the installation tests with beats-tester.

  • run elasticsearch-ci/docs : Re-trigger the docs validation. (use unformatted text in the comment!)

@rdner rdner merged commit 7be5c87 into 8.0 Jan 26, 2022
@rdner rdner deleted the mergify/bp/8.0/pr-30025 branch January 26, 2022 21:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants