Cherry-pick #21756 to 7.9: [Filebeat][httpjson] Fix date_cursor validation #21982
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
* Fix date_cursor validation * Only check for parse errors (cherry picked from commit 471df0b)
|
Pinging @elastic/siem (Team:SIEM) |
botelastic
bot
added
needs_team
💚 Build Succeeded
Expand to view the summary
Build stats
Test stats 🧪
|
leweafan
pushed a commit
to leweafan/beats
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 28, 2023
…tic#21982) * Fix date_cursor validation * Only check for parse errors (cherry picked from commit 15251d4)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Cherry-pick of PR #21756 to 7.9 branch. Original message:
What does this PR do?
It fixes the
httpjsondate_cursorconfig validation by using a fixed date for format validation.Why is it important?
Before
nowwas used as the date to validate the format against, some formats (like the one used in the tests, which caused a new failing test recently #21748) depending on the current date, would fail or not, causing flaky validation outputs.Checklist
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation- [ ] I have made corresponding change to the default configuration files- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works- [ ] I have added an entry inCHANGELOG.next.asciidocorCHANGELOG-developer.next.asciidoc.Related issues