-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[docs] Adds list of type changes to the 7.0 breaking changes docs #17911
Conversation
Pinging @elastic/integrations (Team:Integrations) |
Thanks @dedemorton. I haven't been following the changes in Beats closely after the lead up to 7.0, nor am I familiar with the field changes that happened before 7.0 that were unrelated to ECS. But I'll be happy to review once this is ready. |
Unfortunately I'm not really familiar with all the changes made. I guess we will have to discuss how we can track schema changes better in the future |
@webmat @urso Sounds like we have two separate problems. We need to:
I'm not sure where to go from here. For 1, is there some way to reconstruct the schema changes that are not included in this PR? Is it worth the effort? Can we automate it? For 2, I wonder if @andresrc can help. |
Agreed, that's why I opened the initial issue. Once again, all of the ECS-related changes have been tracked, as far as I know. It's a matter of looking at what else people were doing at that time, that weren't captured. I opened that original issue because I can't do it myself. I've worked on a bunch of Filebeat modules for 3 months, once. But that's it. I don't know the code base very much. |
💔 Build FailedExpand to view the summary
Build stats
Steps errorsExpand to view the steps failures
Log outputExpand to view the last 100 lines of log output
|
This PR is stalled. Should I close it? |
I'm afraid so, sorry for this, let's try to get it better for 8.0 |
Adds list of type changes requested in #11790.
#11790 has been open for a very long time. I was hoping the dev team would take ownership because the list of changed types is incomplete.
For the sake of getting what we know into the published docs, I'm opening this PR. I think, however, that this kind of documentation should be generated or at last maintained by the dev team when they make changes to field types or names.
@webmat Including you as a reviewer because you opened the original issue.
@urso Adding you to the review so we have a plan going forward to make sure this doesn't happen again.