-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 528
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update beats to bd6981d #92
Conversation
Important changes / additions: * Add support for cloud id. See elastic/beats#4964 for more details. This could simplify the onboard for users that use apm-server with the Cloud in the future. * Be able to overwrite index pattern in the index template. See elastic/beats#4769 for more details. This allows to clean up our system tests.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Everything in _beats/
is generated by updating the beats framework right?
What is the point in overwriting the index pattern
for an apm server?
# The template name and pattern has to be set in case the elasticsearch index pattern is modified. | ||
#setup.template.name: "apm-server-%{[beat.version]}" | ||
|
||
# Template patttern. By default the template patter is "-%{[beat.version]}-*" to apply to the default index settings. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
typo
the template patter is..
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That is a typo I need to fix on the beats side.
# The version of the beat will always be appended to the given name | ||
# so the final name is apm-server-%{[beat.version]}. | ||
#setup.template.name: "apm-server" | ||
# Template name. By default the template name is "apm-server-%{[beat.version]}" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should we keep havig. beat.version
here or change to apmserver.version
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The fields used here must be part of the event. We have beat.version
but we don't have apm-server.version
in our events.
@simitt For updating _beats: Yes Our use case for overwriting the index pattern name is for testing. On the beats side especially for logging people create their own templates. But in general it's only expert users that do this and I would not expect it to happen on the apm-server side at first. |
Important Changes / Additions: