Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

security: add permissions block to workflows #227

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 13, 2024

Conversation

reakaleek
Copy link
Member

Details

⚠️ This PR was created by an automated tool. Please review the changes carefully. ⚠️

We want to set the default permissions for workflows to read-only for contents.
This is a security measure to prevent accidental changes to the repository.

This change adds a top-level permissions block to all workflows in the .github/workflows directory.

permissions:
  contents: read

In some cases workflows might need more permissions than just contents: read.
Please checkout this branch and add the necessary permissions to the workflows.

If your workflow uses a Personal Access Token (PAT), we can still add the permissions block,
but it will not have any effect.

Merging this PR as is might cause workflows that need more permissions to fail.

If there are any questions, please reach out to the @elastic/observablt-ci

@reakaleek reakaleek requested a review from a team as a code owner February 17, 2024 19:01
@reakaleek reakaleek self-assigned this Feb 17, 2024
@reakaleek reakaleek requested a review from a team February 17, 2024 19:01
@elastic-apm-tech elastic-apm-tech added the safe-to-test Changes are safe to run in the CI label Feb 17, 2024
@reakaleek reakaleek enabled auto-merge (squash) March 13, 2024 12:51
@reakaleek reakaleek merged commit ec9d6bd into main Mar 13, 2024
8 checks passed
@reakaleek reakaleek deleted the gh-oblt/add-permission-block-to-workflows branch March 13, 2024 12:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
safe-to-test Changes are safe to run in the CI
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants