Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Fix for 11 vulnerabilities #211

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ekmixon
Copy link
Owner

@ekmixon ekmixon commented Nov 28, 2023

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `yarn` dependencies of this project.

Changes included in this PR

  • Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
    • ui/package.json

Note for zero-installs users

If you are using the Yarn feature zero-installs that was introduced in Yarn V2, note that this PR does not update the .yarn/cache/ directory meaning this code cannot be pulled and immediately developed on as one would expect for a zero-install project - you will need to run yarn to update the contents of the ./yarn/cache directory.
If you are not using zero-install you can ignore this as your flow should likely be unchanged.

⚠️ Warning
Failed to update the yarn.lock, please update manually before merging.

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

With an upgrade:
Severity Priority Score (*) Issue Breaking Change Exploit Maturity
high severity 696/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 7.5
Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-ANSIREGEX-1583908
Yes Proof of Concept
critical severity 679/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 9.3
Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs
SNYK-JS-BABELTRAVERSE-5962463
Yes No Known Exploit
medium severity 586/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 5.3
Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-BROWSERSLIST-1090194
Yes Proof of Concept
medium severity 586/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 5.3
Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-GLOBPARENT-1016905
Yes Proof of Concept
medium severity 641/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 6.4
Prototype Pollution
SNYK-JS-JSON5-3182856
Yes Proof of Concept
high severity 681/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 7.2
Command Injection
SNYK-JS-LODASHTEMPLATE-1088054
No Proof of Concept
high severity 589/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 7.5
Prototype Pollution
SNYK-JS-UNSETVALUE-2400660
Yes No Known Exploit
medium severity 539/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 6.5
Improper Input Validation
SNYK-JS-XMLDOM-1534562
No No Known Exploit
high severity 639/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 8.5
Prototype Pollution
SNYK-JS-XMLDOM-3042242
No No Known Exploit
critical severity 811/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 9.8
Improper Input Validation
SNYK-JS-XMLDOM-3092935
No Proof of Concept
low severity 506/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 3.7
Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
npm:clean-css:20180306
Yes Proof of Concept

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
🦉 Prototype Pollution
🦉 Improper Input Validation

Micro-Learning Topic: OS command injection (Detected by phrase)

Matched on "Command Injection"

What is this? (2min video)

In many situations, applications will rely on OS provided functions, scripts, macros and utilities instead of reimplementing them in code. While functions would typically be accessed through a native interface library, the remaining three OS provided features will normally be invoked via the command line or launched as a process. If unsafe inputs are used to construct commands or arguments, it may allow arbitrary OS operations to be performed that can compromise the server.

Try a challenge in Secure Code Warrior

Helpful references
  • OWASP Command Injection - OWASP community page with comprehensive information about command injection, and links to various OWASP resources to help detect or prevent it.
  • OWASP testing for Command Injection - This article is focused on providing testing techniques for identifying command injection flaws in your applications

Micro-Learning Topic: Regular expression denial of service (Detected by phrase)

Matched on "Regular Expression Denial of Service"

What is this? (2min video)

Denial of Service (DoS) attacks caused by Regular Expression which causes the system to hang or cause them to work very slowly when attacker sends a well-crafted input(exponentially related to input size).Denial of service attacks significantly degrade the service quality experienced by legitimate users. These attacks introduce large response delays, excessive losses, and service interruptions, resulting in direct impact on availability.

Try a challenge in Secure Code Warrior

Micro-Learning Topic: Weak input validation (Detected by phrase)

Matched on "Improper Input Validation"

Injection flaws, such as SQL, NoSQL, OS, and LDAP injection, occur when untrusted data is sent to an interpreter as part of a command or query. The attacker’s hostile data can trick the interpreter into executing unintended commands or accessing data without proper authorization. Source: https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Category:OWASP_Top_Ten_Project

Try a challenge in Secure Code Warrior

Helpful references

Micro-Learning Topic: Denial of service (Detected by phrase)

Matched on "Denial of Service"

The Denial of Service (DoS) attack is focused on making a resource (site, application, server) unavailable for the purpose it was designed. There are many ways to make a service unavailable for legitimate users by manipulating network packets, programming, logical, or resources handling vulnerabilities, among others. Source: https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Denial_of_Service

Try a challenge in Secure Code Warrior

Micro-Learning Topic: Prototype pollution (Detected by phrase)

Matched on "Prototype Pollution"

What is this? (2min video)

By adding or modifying attributes of an object prototype, it is possible to create attributes that exist on every object, or replace critical attributes with malicious ones. This can be problematic if the software depends on existence or non-existence of certain attributes, or uses pre-defined attributes of object prototype (such as hasOwnProperty, toString or valueOf).

Try a challenge in Secure Code Warrior

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants