BUGFIX/HCMPRE-1826 : Enhanced microplan validation #2147
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to two files in the campaign manager module: Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🔭 Outside diff range comments (2)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/hooks/useProductList.js (2)
Line range hint
11-17: Add null checks to prevent runtime errors.The code assumes
additionalFieldsandfieldsproperties always exist, which could lead to runtime errors.Apply this diff to add necessary null checks:
if (projectType === "DEFAULT") { return data?.ProductVariant; } const filteredData = data?.ProductVariant?.filter(item => - item.additionalFields?.fields?.some(field => field.key === "projectType" && field.value === projectType) + item?.additionalFields?.fields?.some(field => field?.key === "projectType" && field?.value === projectType) ); return filteredData;
Line range hint
11-17: Consider optimizing the filtering logic for better performance.The current implementation uses nested array operations (filter + some) which could impact performance with large datasets.
Consider using a more efficient approach:
if (projectType === "DEFAULT") { return data?.ProductVariant; } + // Create a Map for O(1) lookup instead of O(n*m) nested loops + const filteredData = data?.ProductVariant?.filter(item => { + const fields = item?.additionalFields?.fields || []; + for (const field of fields) { + if (field?.key === "projectType" && field?.value === projectType) { + return true; + } + } + return false; + }); - const filteredData = data?.ProductVariant?.filter(item => - item.additionalFields?.fields?.some(field => field.key === "projectType" && field.value === projectType) - ); return filteredData;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/components/UploadData.js(1 hunks)health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/hooks/useProductList.js(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/hooks/useProductList.js (1)
Pattern **/*.js: check
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/components/UploadData.js (1)
Pattern **/*.js: check
🔇 Additional comments (1)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/hooks/useProductList.js (1)
Line range hint
11-17: Verify valid projectType values.The code assumes "DEFAULT" as a special case, but we should verify all possible projectType values to ensure correct filtering.
Let's check the usage of projectType values in the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Project type implementation is valid and well-structured
The code shows a robust implementation where:
- Project types are centrally managed through MDMS (HCM-PROJECT-TYPES.projectTypes)
- "DEFAULT" is a valid special case used specifically for product filtering
- The system includes proper validation and error handling for project types
- Different project types (e.g., "MR-DN") have specific business logic implementations
The filtering implementation in useProductList.js correctly handles both the "DEFAULT" special case and specific project type filtering through additionalFields.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all possible values of projectType being passed to useProductList # Expected: List of files showing how projectType is used # Search for useProductList hook usage rg -l "useProductList" # Search for "projectType" string literals rg '"projectType"' -A 2 -B 2Length of output: 22076
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for MDMS configs and translation files rg -g '*.json' -l 'CAMPAIGN_PROJECT_|CAMPAIGN_TYPE_' # Search for MDMS related files fd -e json mdms # Search for any constant definitions or enums rg -B 2 -A 2 'const.*Type.*=|enum.*Type'Length of output: 97358
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for MDMS configuration files and project type definitions rg -g '*.json' -g '*.yaml' -g '*.yml' 'HCM-PROJECT-TYPES' # Search for files containing project type definitions rg -g '*.json' -g '*.yaml' -g '*.yml' '"projectTypes":' # Search for MDMS schema files fd -e json -e yaml -e yml mdmsLength of output: 148
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for campaign/project type related strings rg -A 2 -B 2 'CAMPAIGN_TYPE_|PROJECT_TYPE_|projectType.*=|campaignType.*=' # Search for campaign type configuration or usage rg -g '*.js' -g '*.json' '"type":\s*"(campaign|project)"' # Search for files containing campaign configuration fd -e js -e json campaign.*configLength of output: 71930
...cro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/components/UploadData.js
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Summary by CodeRabbit
The changes improve data validation and filtering mechanisms for campaign management, ensuring more robust and flexible data processing.