Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: use runscript v2 #276

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 10, 2024
Merged

feat: use runscript v2 #276

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 10, 2024

Conversation

fengmk2
Copy link
Member

@fengmk2 fengmk2 commented Dec 9, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated .gitignore to include .package-lock.json and expanded ignored files.
    • Incremented version in package.json to 6.11.0 and updated runscript dependency to ^2.0.0.
    • Modified import statements for runscript in various files to use named imports.
    • Updated comments for consistency in test files.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 9, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
egg-bin ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Dec 9, 2024 1:57pm

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 9, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request includes modifications to several files, primarily focusing on updating import statements for the runscript module from default to named imports. The .gitignore file has been updated to include new entries for ignored files and directories, including .package-lock.json. The package.json file reflects a version increment and an updated dependency version for runscript. Additionally, minor corrections were made in comments and punctuation across the files.

Changes

File Change Summary
.gitignore Updated to include .package-lock.json, .eslintcache, dist, and specific typings directory.
package.json Version incremented to 6.11.0; updated runscript dependency from ^1.5.3 to ^2.0.0.
scripts/postinstall.js Changed import of runscript to named import runScript; corrected comment header typo.
src/middleware/global_options.ts Changed import of runscript to named import runScript; updated invocation in the code.
test/ts.test.ts Changed import of runscript to named import runScript; updated comments for punctuation.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Middleware
    participant Script
    participant Package

    User->>Middleware: Request with options
    Middleware->>Script: Import runScript
    Script->>Package: Execute runScript
    Package-->>Script: Return result
    Script-->>Middleware: Send response
    Middleware-->>User: Respond with options
Loading

🐰 In the code, a change we see,
A hop to runScript, oh so free!
With .gitignore now more neat,
Dependencies updated, can't be beat!
A little fix in comments too,
Hooray for changes, all brand new! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

🚮 Removed packages: npm/[email protected]

View full report↗︎

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
scripts/postinstall.js (1)

6-6: Fix typo in comment

"postintall.js" should be "postinstall.js"

test/ts.test.ts (1)

263-263: Fix remaining comment inconsistencies

For consistency with other similar comments in the file, add apostrophes to these comments.

-        // dont use npmmirror.com on CI
+        // don't use npmmirror.com on CI

Also applies to: 392-392

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 696d846 and 2d387c3.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • .gitignore (1 hunks)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
  • scripts/postinstall.js (2 hunks)
  • src/middleware/global_options.ts (2 hunks)
  • test/ts.test.ts (5 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • .gitignore
🔇 Additional comments (4)
scripts/postinstall.js (1)

4-4: LGTM: Correctly updated runscript v2 usage

The changes correctly update the import and usage of runscript to match v2's API.

Also applies to: 44-44

package.json (1)

28-28: Verify runscript v2 compatibility and security

The update from runscript v1 to v2 is a major version change. Let's verify:

  1. The latest stable version
  2. Any security advisories
  3. Breaking changes that might affect the codebase
✅ Verification successful

Node.js version compatibility check required for runscript v2

The update to runscript v2.0.0 drops support for Node.js versions below 14.0.0. Let's verify the project's Node.js version requirements:


Runscript v2.0.0 update is compatible

The package.json requires Node.js >= 16.19.0, which is well above runscript v2.0.0's minimum requirement of Node.js 14. The update is safe as:

  • Using the latest stable version (2.0.0)
  • Node.js version compatibility is maintained
  • Breaking changes only affect Node.js version support, which is already satisfied
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check latest version and security advisories for runscript

# Get latest version from npm
echo "Latest version from npm:"
npm view runscript version

# Check for known vulnerabilities
echo "Checking for vulnerabilities:"
npm audit [email protected] --json || true

# Check commit history for breaking changes
echo "Checking breaking changes:"
gh api repos/node-modules/runscript/releases | jq '.[].body' | grep -i "breaking"

Length of output: 1494


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check Node.js version requirements
echo "Package.json engines field:"
cat package.json | jq '.engines'

echo -e "\nNode.js version usage in workflows:"
fd -e yml -e yaml . .github/workflows/ --exec grep -l "node-version" {} \; -exec cat {} \;

Length of output: 455

src/middleware/global_options.ts (1)

8-8: LGTM: Consistent update to runscript v2

The changes correctly update the import and usage of runscript to match v2's API, maintaining consistency with other files.

Also applies to: 136-136

test/ts.test.ts (1)

5-5: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly

The change from default import to named import aligns with the runscript v2 module's exported interface.

@fengmk2 fengmk2 merged commit 8fac9ae into master Dec 10, 2024
20 checks passed
@fengmk2 fengmk2 deleted the use-runscript-v2 branch December 10, 2024 02:20
fengmk2 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2024
[skip ci]

## [6.12.0](v6.11.0...v6.12.0) (2024-12-10)

### Features

* use runscript v2 ([#276](#276)) ([8fac9ae](8fac9ae))
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Dec 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant