Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat!: remove code owner optional prefix paths #867

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 5, 2024

Conversation

robrap
Copy link
Contributor

@robrap robrap commented Dec 5, 2024

This implements a TODO comment stating that once
edx-platform import_shims is no longer used, we
could remove the _OPTIONAL_MODULE_PREFIX_PATTERN
implementation.
See https://github.com/openedx/edx-platform/tree/854502b560bda74ef898501bb2a95ce238cf794c/import_shims

Phase 1 of the code owner refactor is an opportune time to make this clean-up because we can compare code_owner and code_owner_2 results.

See #784

Merge checklist:
Check off if complete or not applicable:

  • Version bumped
  • Changelog record added
  • Documentation updated (not only docstrings)
  • Fixup commits are squashed away
  • Unit tests added/updated
  • Manual testing instructions provided
  • Noted any: Concerns, dependencies, migration issues, deadlines, tickets

This implements a TODO comment stating that once
edx-platform import_shims is no longer used, we
could remove the _OPTIONAL_MODULE_PREFIX_PATTERN
implementation.
See https://github.com/openedx/edx-platform/tree/854502b560bda74ef898501bb2a95ce238cf794c/import_shims

Phase 1 of the code owner refactor is an opportune time
to make this clean-up because we can compare code_owner and
code_owner_2 results.

See #784
This will be released with another change, and
it doesn't need a changelog entry.
@robrap
Copy link
Contributor Author

robrap commented Dec 5, 2024

Thanks @UsamaSadiq.

@robrap robrap merged commit 3e7eeb6 into main Dec 5, 2024
6 checks passed
@robrap robrap deleted the robrap/remove-code-owner-prefixes branch December 5, 2024 20:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants