Redistribute field data with a different NPROMA #23
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
|
awnawab
approved these changes
Feb 8, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for this Phillipe, looks good to me! I must admit I don't fully understand the gather/scatter functionality (it would be great to see this in action, if you could please point me to an example) but from what I can gather (pun intended 😄 ) from the unit-tests this is a very powerful feature 👍
|
Hello Ahmad, You can see a real example here : |
…roma-shuffle Conflicts: tests/CMakeLists.txt
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This branch introduces a new class (FIELD_SHUFFLE) to reshuffle NPROMA blocked data with a different blocking factor. This class is similar to the FIELD_GATHSCAT class, which is now a parent of FIELD_SHUFFLE.