Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove xpand based Xtext2Ecore Postprocessor (Xpand removal part 1) #2810

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 29, 2023

Conversation

cdietrich
Copy link
Contributor

@cdietrich cdietrich commented Sep 28, 2023

see #2811

@cdietrich cdietrich added this to the Release_2.33 milestone Sep 28, 2023
@cdietrich cdietrich requested a review from szarnekow September 28, 2023 17:01
@@ -141,12 +141,6 @@ public void configureFilterTerminalRulesContribution(Binder binder) {

@Deprecated(forRemoval = true)
public void configureIXtext2EcorePostProcessor(Binder binder) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The entire method can be removed, since it is in xtext.xtext.ui

@@ -122,14 +122,8 @@ public Class<? extends IValueConverterService> bindIValueConverterService() {
/**
* @since 2.9
*/
@SuppressWarnings({"removal","deprecation"})
@Deprecated
public void configureIXtext2EcorePostProcessor(Binder binder) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Likewise.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i wanted to keep these in a first step and do their removal in a 2nd stage

@cdietrich cdietrich merged commit 45eb5f4 into main Sep 29, 2023
5 checks passed
@cdietrich cdietrich deleted the cd_byeXpand branch September 29, 2023 08:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants