Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: add CodeQL workflow #1143

Conversation

paullatzelsperger
Copy link
Contributor

WHAT

Adds a CodeQL workflow that replaces veracode

WHY

https://eclipse-tractusx.github.io/docs/release/trg-0/trg-8-01

FURTHER NOTES

List other areas of code that have changed but are not necessarily linked to the main feature. This could be method signature changes, package declarations, bugs that were encountered and were fixed inline, etc.

Closes # <-- insert Issue number if one exists

@paullatzelsperger paullatzelsperger force-pushed the chore/add_codql_workflow branch from 7766507 to eb4fcde Compare March 18, 2024 14:22
Copy link

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.9% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

@paullatzelsperger paullatzelsperger merged commit 68e6b04 into eclipse-tractusx:main Mar 18, 2024
27 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Merged
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants