-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update manufactured_parts_quality_information -> update of shared shared BPNS trait #628
Update manufactured_parts_quality_information -> update of shared shared BPNS trait #628
Conversation
Validation Report for io.catenax.manufactured_parts_quality_information/2.1.0/ManufacturedPartsQualityInformation.ttlInput model is valid |
@agg3fe Could you check the model? Thank you |
io.catenax.manufactured_parts_quality_information/2.1.0/ManufacturedPartsQualityInformation.ttl
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Validation Report for io.catenax.manufactured_parts_quality_information/2.1.0/ManufacturedPartsQualityInformation.ttlInput model is valid |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Hi @agg3fe I'm on vacation next week. I ask today, who from CX use case quality could proxy me on Monday's meeting. Change of model was discussed and agreed by CX quality use case team. In case I find nobody could you bring this to MS3 next week? |
Ok, I can do that. |
samm:characteristic samm-c:Text ; | ||
samm:exampleValue "12345" . | ||
|
||
:parentSerialNumber a samm:Property ; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
property naming changes required:
customerPartInstanceId
or
parentPartInstanceId
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As this model is used in a not Industry Core related use case, we decided to leave this as is for now. In a future version this should be resolved, which will, be guardrailed by a yet to define MS2 requirement. (#642 )
samm:characteristic :PositiveNumber ; | ||
samm:exampleValue "1"^^xsd:positiveInteger . | ||
|
||
:parentPartNumber a samm:Property ; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
PartId
or customerPartId
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As this model is used in a not Industry Core related use case, we decided to leave this as is for now. In a future version this should be resolved, which will, be guardrailed by a yet to define MS2 requirement. (#642 )
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@agg3fe proceed with MS3 approval in next meeting
io.catenax.manufactured_parts_quality_information/RELEASE_NOTES.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Changed date to MS3 date
Validation Report for io.catenax.manufactured_parts_quality_information/2.1.0/ManufacturedPartsQualityInformation.ttlInput model is valid |
Description
[2.1.0]
Added
Changed
Removed
Closes #626
MS2 Criteria
(to be filled out by PR reviewer)
DismantlerId
andDismantlerName
use an EntityDismantler
with the propertiesname
andid
or use a URN likeio.catenax.dismantler:0.0.1
)preferredName
anddescription
are not the samepreferredName
should be human readable and follow normal orthography (e.g., no camel case but normal word separation)MS3 Criteria
(to be filled out by semantic modeling team before merge to main-branch)