feat(certificate): db enablement company certificates

[AnuragNagpure]

Description

Enable companies to fetch their company certificates with the respective document status.

Why

To ensure that the feature can get supported, first changes on db level are needed ++ seeding data adjustments. Tables added are mentioned below
CompanyCertificate
CompanyCertificateStatus
CompanyCertificateType
CompanyCertificateTypeDescription

Issue

#471

Checklist

Please delete options that are not relevant.

• I have followed the contributing guidelines
• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have successfully tested my changes locally
• I have added tests that prove my changes work
• I have checked that new and existing tests pass locally with my changes
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas

[Phil91]

@jjeroch the implementation in this PR adds a Id field to the company_certificates table. That differentiate to the description in the issue and I couldn't find a discussion in the issue nor Jira. Main reason for that is if we don't have the field a company could only have one entry linked to company_certificate_type. Example BMW has an ISO 9001certificate which is inactive, they could never create a new one, only way to have an ISO 9001 certificate is to update the inactive one, in my opinion we shouldn't do that, do you agree with that or should Anurag remove the Id field?

@AnuragNagpure one general thing I recognised, please use conventional commits not only for the PR title. Please use it for your commit messages as well

[jjeroch]

@jjeroch the implementation in this PR adds a Id field to the company_certificates table. That differentiate to the description in the issue and I couldn't find a discussion in the issue nor Jira. Main reason for that is if we don't have the field a company could only have one entry linked to company_certificate_type. Example BMW has an ISO 9001certificate which is inactive, they could never create a new one, only way to have an ISO 9001 certificate is to update the inactive one, in my opinion we shouldn't do that, do you agree with that or should Anurag remove the Id field?

@AnuragNagpure one general thing I recognised, please use conventional commits not only for the PR title. Please use it for your commit messages as well

Hi @Phil91 & @AnuragNagpure fully agree with your proposal. BMW must have the chance to have an ISO 9001certificate in status "INACTIVE" while a second is in status "ACTIVE"

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[ntruchsess]

to end up with a single 1.8.0-rc5-migration the changes from #389 have been merged and the migration has been recreated.