-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[feat|fix] : SDE backend : hot fix for 3.2 with pcf version #75
[feat|fix] : SDE backend : hot fix for 3.2 with pcf version #75
Conversation
…ax-ng/tx-managed-simple-data-exchanger-backend into hotfix_3.2_with_pcf_part_2
- Docker image update. - legal info updated for image. - change log update. - Install. md update.
@adityagajbhiye9 could you please raise a issue against us as to become a least a contributor to the Ecplise Tractus-X GitHub Organisation https://github.com/eclipse-tractusx/sig-infra/issues/new?assignees=&labels=support&projects=&template=support-add-project-contributor.md&title=New+Tractus-X+project+contributor |
@sachinargade123 could you please give me the information who is also in your team to validate the changes? |
Sure, I will raise a issue. |
if i want to merge your PR ECA Check will fail, because you directly committed on @sachinargade123 branch... unless your a contributor to this project please be also aware of |
@dvasunin could you please verify the changes from @sachinargade123 and @adityagajbhiye9 |
@FaGru3n I have raised issue. |
|
||
@Value(value = "${edc.hostname}${edc.dataplane.endpointpath:/api/public}") | ||
public String digitalTwinEdcDataplaneEndpoint; | ||
|
||
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Optional: consider to make it private final
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@FaGru3n I have reviewed and approved. |
Hi @ChetanT-System thanks for mentioning, but why the pressure to me to merge? Only following our Tractus-X Release Guidlines and when there is no committer in your team, would be good if there were some member. That the upstream branch can updated regularly. see also... eclipse-tractusx/managed-simple-data-exchanger-frontend#45 (comment) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM - content can not verified structure of the PR seems good.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can't check the changes to java code. Rest LGTM
Hi @FaGru3n Thank you for your support ! I'm not pressuring to you :) |
please close PR #74 this before this
Description
Added
Fixed
Pre-review checks
Please ensure to do as many of the following checks as possible, before asking for committer review: